Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Oct;53(5):432-41.
doi: 10.3325/cmj.2012.53.432.

Does the patient with chest pain have a coronary heart disease? Diagnostic value of single symptoms and signs--a meta-analysis

Affiliations
Review

Does the patient with chest pain have a coronary heart disease? Diagnostic value of single symptoms and signs--a meta-analysis

Jorg Haasenritter et al. Croat Med J. 2012 Oct.

Abstract

Aim: To determine the diagnostic value of single symptoms and signs for coronary heart disease (CHD) in patients with chest pain.

Methods: Searches of two electronic databases (EMBASE 1980 to March 2008, PubMed 1966 to May 2009) and hand searching in seven journals were conducted. Eligible studies recruited patients presenting with acute or chronic chest pain. The target disease was CHD, with no restrictions regarding case definitions, eg, stable CHD, acute coronary syndrome (ACS), acute myocardial infarction (MI), or major cardiac event (MCE). Diagnostic tests of interest were items of medical history and physical examination. Bivariate random effects model was used to derive summary estimates of positive (pLR) and negative likelihood ratios (nLR).

Results: We included 172 studies providing data on the diagnostic value of 42 symptoms and signs. With respect to case definition of CHD, diagnostically most useful tests were history of CHD (pLR=3.59), known MI (pLR=3.21), typical angina (pLR=2.35), history of diabetes mellitus (pLR=2.16), exertional pain (pLR=2.13), history of angina pectoris (nLR=0.42), and male sex (nLR=0.49) for diagnosing stable CHD; pain radiation to right arm/shoulder (pLR=4.43) and palpitation (pLR=0.47) for diagnosing MI; visceral pain (pLR=2.05) for diagnosing ACS; and typical angina (pLR=2.60) and pain reproducible by palpation (pLR=0.13) for predicting MCE.

Conclusions: We comprehensively reported the accuracy of a broad spectrum of single symptoms and signs for diagnosing myocardial ischemia. Our results suggested that the accuracy of several symptoms and signs varied in the published studies according to the case definition of CHD.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow of study selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Methodological quality of included studies in regard to 7 quality criteria.

Comment in

  • May chest pain describe coronary heart disease?
    Balta S, Cakar M, Demırkol S, Kucuk U, Ay SA, Unlu M. Balta S, et al. Croat Med J. 2013 Aug;54(4):411. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2013.54.411. Croat Med J. 2013. PMID: 23986286 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Hurst JW, Morris DC. Chest pain. Armonk (NY): Futura Pub; 2001.
    1. Mant J, McManus RJ, Oakes RA, Delaney BC, Barton PM, Deeks JJ, et al. Systematic review and modelling of the investigation of acute and chronic chest pain presenting in primary care. Health Technol Assess. 2004;8:1–iii158. - PubMed
    1. Bruyninckx R, Aertgeerts B, Bruyninckx P, Buntinx F. Signs and symptoms in diagnosing acute myocardial infarction and acute coronary syndrome: a diagnostic meta-analysis. Br J Gen Pract. 2008;58:105–11. doi: 10.3399/bjgp08X277014. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chun AA, McGee SR. Bedside diagnosis of coronary artery disease: a systematic review. Am J Med. 2004;117:334–43. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.03.021. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Harbord RM, Whiting P, Sterne JA, Egger M, Deeks JJ, Shang A, et al. An empirical comparison of methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy showed hierarchical models are necessary. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008;61:1095–103. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.09.013. - DOI - PubMed