Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2012 Oct;53(5):442-9.
doi: 10.3325/cmj.2012.53.442.

Prognostic performance of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II in major Croatian hospitals: a prospective multicenter study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Prognostic performance of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II in major Croatian hospitals: a prospective multicenter study

Kristian Desa et al. Croat Med J. 2012 Oct.

Abstract

Aim: To perform an external validation of the original Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) system and to assess its performance in a selected group of patients in major Croatian hospitals.

Methods: A prospective, multicenter study was conducted in five university hospitals and one general hospital during a six-month period between November 1, 2007 and May 1, 2008. Standardized hospital mortality ratio (SMR) was calculated from the mean predicted mortality of all the 2756 patients and the actual mortality for the same group of patients. The validation of SAPS II was made using the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), 2×2 classification tables, and Hosmer-Lemeshow tests.

Results: The predicted mortality was as low as 14.6% due to a small proportion of medical patients and the SMR being 0.89 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78-0.98). The SAPS II system demonstrated a good discriminatory power as measured by the AUC (0.85; standard error [SE]=0.012; 95% CI=0.840-0.866; P<0.001). This system significantly overestimated the actual mortality (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit H statistic: χ(2) =584.4; P<0.001 and C statistics: χ(2)(8) =313.0; P<0.001) in the group of patients included in the study.

Conclusion: The SAPS II had a good discrimination, but it significantly overestimated the observed mortality in comparison with the predicted mortality in this group of patients in Croatia. Therefore, caution is required when an evaluation is performed at the individual level.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (curved line connected with the circles) including standard deviation lines (curved dotted lines) in intensive care units (ICU) in major Croatian hospitals and example of ROC value of 0.5 (diagonal line). The relationship between true positives (sensitivity) and false positives (100-specificity) is presented. The area under the ROC curve was 0.85.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Calibration curve for the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II. The solid line represents a perfect correspondence between the observed and predicted mortality; the dotted line represents the observed vs predicted mortality; columns show the distribution of the patients in the analyzed groups.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ridley S. Severity of scoring systems and performance appraisal. Anaesthesia. 1998;53:1185–94. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00615.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. An evaluation of outcome from intensive care in major medical centers. Ann Intern Med. 1986;104:410–8. - PubMed
    1. Le Gall JR, Lemeshow S, Saulnier F. A new simplified acute physiology score (SAPS II) based on European/North American multicentre study. JAMA. 1993;270:2957–63. doi: 10.1001/jama.1993.03510240069035. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Le Gall JR, Loirat P, Alperovitch A, Glaser P, Granthil C, Mathieu D, et al. A simplified acute physiology score for ICU patients. Crit Care Med. 1984;12:975–7. doi: 10.1097/00003246-198411000-00012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Castella X, Artigas A, Bion J, Kari A. A comparison of severity of illness scoring systems for intensive care unit patients: Results of a multicenter, multinational study. Crit Care Med. 1995;23:1327–35. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199508000-00005. - DOI - PubMed