Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Apr;63(4):667-76.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.10.003. Epub 2012 Oct 12.

Midterm results from an international multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing bipolar with monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate

Charalampos Mamoulakis  1 , Michael Schulze, Andreas Skolarikos, Gerasimos Alivizatos, Roberto M Scarpa, Jens J Rassweiler, Jean J M C H de la Rosette, Cesare M Scoffone
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Midterm results from an international multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing bipolar with monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate

Charalampos Mamoulakis et al. Eur Urol. 2013 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Pooled data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with short-term follow-up have shown a safety advantage for bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (B-TURP) compared with monopolar TURP (M-TURP). However, RCTs with follow-up >12 mo are scarce.

Objective: To compare the midterm safety/efficacy of B-TURP versus M-TURP.

Design, setting, and participants: From July 2006 to June 2009, TURP candidates with benign prostatic obstruction were consecutively recruited in four centres, randomised 1:1 into the M-TURP or the B-TURP arm and regularly followed up to 36 mo postoperatively. A total of 295 patients were enrolled.

Intervention: M-TURP or B-TURP using the AUTOCON II 400 electrosurgical unit.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Safety was estimated by complication rates with a special emphasis on urethral strictures (US) and bladder neck contractures (BNCs) recorded during the short-term (up to 12 mo) and midterm (up to 36 mo) follow-up. Efficacy quantified by changes in maximum urine flow rate, postvoid residual urine volume, and International Prostate Symptom Score was compared with baseline, and reintervention rates in each arm were also evaluated.

Results and limitations: A total of 279 patients received treatment after allocation. Mean follow-up was 28.8 mo. A total of 186 of 279 patients (66.7%) completed the 36-mo follow-up. Posttreatment withdrawal rates did not differ significantly between arms. Safety was assessed in 230 patients (82.4%) at a mean follow-up of 33.4 mo. Ten US cases were seen in each arm (M-TURP vs B-TURP: 9.3% vs 8.2%; p=0.959); two versus eight BNC cases (M-TURP vs B-TURP: 1.9% vs 6.6%; p=0.108) were collectively detected at the midterm follow-up. Resection type was not a significant predictor of the risk of US/BNC formation. Efficacy was similar between arms and durable. A total of 10 of 230 patients (4.3%) experienced failure to cure and needed reintervention without significant differences between arms. High overall reintervention rates, withdrawal rates, and sample size determination not based on US/BNC rates represent potential limitations.

Conclusions: The midterm safety and efficacy of B-TURP and M-TURP are comparable.

Trial registration: Netherlands Trial Register, NTR703 (http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=703).

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types