Medicare payments for outpatient urological surgery by location of care
- PMID: 23102712
- PMCID: PMC4008316
- DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.031
Medicare payments for outpatient urological surgery by location of care
Abstract
Purpose: The cost implications associated with offloading outpatient surgery from hospitals to ambulatory surgery centers and the physician office remain poorly defined. Therefore, we determined whether payments for outpatient surgery vary by location of care.
Materials and methods: Using national Medicare claims from 1998 to 2006, we identified elderly patients who underwent 1 of 22 common outpatient urological procedures. For each procedure we measured all relevant payments (in United States dollars) made during the 30-day claims window that encompassed the procedure date. We then categorized payment types (hospital, physician and outpatient facility). Finally, we used multivariable regression to compare price standardized payments across hospitals, ambulatory surgery centers and the physician office.
Results: Average total payments for outpatient surgery episodes varied widely from $200 for urethral dilation in the physician office to $5,688 for hospital based shock wave lithotripsy. For all but 2 procedure groups, ambulatory surgery centers and physician offices were associated with lower overall episode payments than hospitals. For instance, average total payments for urodynamic procedures performed at ambulatory surgery centers were less than a third of those done at hospitals (p <0.001). Compared to hospitals, office based prostate biopsies were nearly 75% less costly (p <0.001). Outpatient facility payments were the biggest driver of these differences.
Conclusions: These data support policies that encourage the provision of outpatient surgery in less resource intensive settings.
Copyright © 2012 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Effects of the Medicare Modernization Act on Spending for Outpatient Surgery.Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug;53 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):2858-2869. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12807. Epub 2017 Nov 30. Health Serv Res. 2018. PMID: 29194621 Free PMC article.
-
Costs of shoulder and elbow procedures are significantly reduced in ambulatory surgery centers compared to hospital outpatient departments.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Oct;32(10):2123-2131. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.05.039. Epub 2023 Jul 6. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023. PMID: 37422131
-
Medicare reimbursement changes for ambulatory surgery centers and remuneration to urological physician-owners.J Urol. 2008 Sep;180(3):1070-4. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.05.051. Epub 2008 Jul 17. J Urol. 2008. PMID: 18639293 Free PMC article.
-
Ambulatory surgery centers and interventional techniques: a look at long-term survival.Pain Physician. 2011 Mar-Apr;14(2):E177-215. Pain Physician. 2011. PMID: 21412380 Review.
-
Recommendations of the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MEDPAC) on the Health Care Delivery System: the impact on interventional pain management in 2014 and beyond.Pain Physician. 2013 Sep-Oct;16(5):419-40. Pain Physician. 2013. PMID: 24077189 Review.
Cited by
-
Effects of the Medicare Modernization Act on Spending for Outpatient Surgery.Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug;53 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):2858-2869. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12807. Epub 2017 Nov 30. Health Serv Res. 2018. PMID: 29194621 Free PMC article.
-
The economics of stone disease.World J Urol. 2017 Sep;35(9):1321-1329. doi: 10.1007/s00345-017-2003-y. Epub 2017 Jan 20. World J Urol. 2017. PMID: 28108799
-
Variation in Spending around Surgical Episodes of Urinary Stone Disease: Findings from Michigan.J Urol. 2018 May;199(5):1277-1282. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.11.075. Epub 2017 Nov 24. J Urol. 2018. PMID: 29180300 Free PMC article.
-
Doing More for More: Unintended Consequences of Financial Incentives for Oncology Specialty Care.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Nov 18;108(2):djv331. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv331. Print 2016 Feb. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015. PMID: 26582063 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of mesh compared with nonmesh sling surgery in Medicare beneficiaries.Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Sep;122(3):546-52. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31829e8543. Obstet Gynecol. 2013. PMID: 23921862 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Owings MF, Kozak LJ. Ambulatory and inpatient procedures in the United States, 1996. Vital Health Stat. 1998;13(139):1. - PubMed
-
- Winter A. Comparing the mix of patients in various outpatient surgery settings. Health Aff (Millwood) 2003;22:68. - PubMed
-
- Cullen KA, Hall MJ, Golosinskiy A. Ambulatory surgery in the United States, 2006. Natl Health Stat Report. 2009;(11):1. - PubMed
-
- Berenson RA, Bodenheimer T, Pham HH. Specialty-service lines: salvos in the new medical arms race. Health Aff (Millwood) 2006;25:w337. - PubMed
-
- Wolfson J, Walker G, Levin PJ. Freestanding ambulatory surgery: cost-containment winner? Healthc Financ Manage. 1993;47:26. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical