Population-level impact of the bivalent, quadrivalent, and nonavalent human papillomavirus vaccines: a model-based analysis
- PMID: 23104323
- DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djs395
Population-level impact of the bivalent, quadrivalent, and nonavalent human papillomavirus vaccines: a model-based analysis
Abstract
Background: Bivalent and quadrivalent human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines are now licensed in several countries. Furthermore, clinical trials examining the efficacy of a nonavalent vaccine are underway. We aimed to compare the potential population-level effectiveness of the bivalent, quadrivalent, and candidate nonavalent HPV vaccines.
Methods: We developed an individual-based, transmission-dynamic model of HPV infection and disease in a population stratified by age, gender, sexual activity, and screening behavior. The model was calibrated to highly stratified sexual behavior, HPV epidemiology, and cervical screening data from Canada.
Results: Under base case assumptions, vaccinating 12-year-old girls (70% coverage) with the bivalent (quadrivalent) vaccine is predicted to reduce the cumulative incidence of anogenital warts (AGWs) by 0.0% (72.1%), diagnosed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia lesions 2 and 3 (CIN2 and -3) by 51.0% (46.1%), and cervical squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) by 31.9% (30.5%), over 70 years. Changing from a bivalent (quadrivalent) to a nonavalent vaccine is predicted to reduce the cumulative number of AGW episodes by an additional 66.7% (0.0%), CIN2 and -3 episodes by an additional 9.3% (12.5%), and SCC cases by an additional 4.8% (6.6%) over 70 years. Differences in predicted population-level effectiveness between the vaccines were most sensitive to duration of protection and the time horizon of analysis. The vaccines produced similar effectiveness at preventing noncervical HPV-related cancers.
Conclusions: The bivalent vaccine is expected to be slightly more effective at preventing CIN2 and -3 and SCC in the longer term, whereas the quadrivalent vaccine is expected to substantially reduce AGW cases shortly after the start of vaccination programs. Switching to a nonavalent vaccine has the potential to further reduce precancerous lesions and cervical cancer.
Comment in
-
Human papillomavirus vaccines for cervical cancer prevention: translating possibility into reality.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012 Nov 21;104(22):1698-701. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djs453. Epub 2012 Oct 27. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012. PMID: 23104325 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
RE: population-level impact of the bivalent, quadrivalent, and candidate nonavalent human papillomavirus vaccines: a comparative model-based analysis.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 May 1;105(9):664; discussion 665-6. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt060. Epub 2013 Mar 15. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013. PMID: 23503601 No abstract available.
-
Response.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013 May 1;105(9):664-5. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt056. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013. PMID: 23767055 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
