Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Jul;9(5):547-557.
doi: 10.2217/pme.12.55.

A molecular assay of tumor radiosensitivity: a roadmap towards biology-based personalized radiation therapy

Affiliations

A molecular assay of tumor radiosensitivity: a roadmap towards biology-based personalized radiation therapy

Javier F Torres-Roca. Per Med. 2012 Jul.

Abstract

The last two decades have seen technological developments that have led to more accurate delivery of radiation therapy (RT), which has resulted in clinical gains in many solid tumors. However, a fundamental question and perhaps the next major hurdle is whether biological strategies can be developed to further enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of RT. This article addresses the development of a novel genomics-based molecular assay to predict tumor radiosensitivity, and proposes that this assay may prove pivotal in the development of biologically guided RT.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Systems biology approaches to modeling disease
Adapted with permission from [72].
Figure 2
Figure 2. Schema for a radiosensitivity classifier
A leave-one-out cross-validation approach was utilized to develop and test the classifier. Linear regression was utilized to identify radiation-specific biomarkers to build the classifier. The classifier was based on a linear regression equation where yx stands for expression for the selected genes and kx are coefficients generated during the training process. Accuracy was 62%, based on continuous variable prediction (not binary; p = 0.002). SF2: Survival fraction at 2 Gy. Data taken from [44]. independent clinical data sets in four disease sites in a total of 621 patients. Importantly, RSI was
Figure 3
Figure 3. Strategy for development of a systems biology model of radiosensitivity
(A) Details the step-by-step approach in the development process. (B) Identification of ten genes in the systems model. A linear regression equation was developed to correlate gene expression and cellular radiosensitivity in a database of 48 cell lines. The final algorithm for RSI was developed in the 48-cell line database as a linear function of gene expression for the ten genes identified. This final lock-down algorithm was then validated in five independent data sets, totaling 621 patients. Data set originated from the Karolinska Institute (Stockholm, Sweden). Data set originated from the Erasmus Medical Center (Rotterdam, The Netherlands). RSI: Radiosensitivity index; TO: Tissue of origin. Adapted with permission from [45] © Elsevier (2009).
Figure 4
Figure 4. Radiosensitivity index is correlated with clinical response to concurrent radiochemotherapy in rectal and esophageal cancer patients
Radiosensitivity index (RSI) for each patient was generated using a rank-based linear regression model built from the cell line data. Statistical significance was determined using a one-sided Mann–Whitney test for differences. (A) The mean RSI of responders is significantly lower than in nonresponders in both clinical cohorts (esophageal: p = 0.05; rectal: p = 0.03). (B) RSI for each individual patient in the cohorts (combined: p = 0.002). PPV: Positive predictive value; Sens.: Sensitivity; Spec.: Specificity; SF2: Survival fraction at 2 Gy. Reproduced with permission from [64] © Elsevier (2009).
Figure 5
Figure 5. Radiosensitivity index distinguishes clinical populations with different disease-related outcomes in head and neck cancer
Radiosensitivity predictions were generated with the gene-expression model as described in 92 patients treated with definitive concurrent radiochemotherapy at The Netherlands Cancer Institute (Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Using the 25th percentile as the cutoff point, there is a superior 2-year locoregional control in the predicted radiosensitive group (green vs red, 86 vs 61%; p = 0.05) Reproduced with permission from [64] © Elsevier (2009).

References

    1. Delaney G, Jacob S, Featherstone C, Barton M. The role of radiotherapy in cancer treatment: estimating optimal utilization from a review of evidence-based clinical guidelines. Cancer. 2005;104(6):1129–1137. - PubMed
    1. Lievens Y, Grau C. Health economics in radiation oncology: introducing the ESTRO HERO project. Radiother Oncol. 2012;103:109–112. - PubMed
    1. Bentzen SRM, Heeren G, Cottier B, et al. Towards evidence-based guidelines for radiotherapy infrastructure and staffing needs in Europe: the ESTRO QUARTS project. Radiother Oncol. 2005;75(3):355–365. - PubMed
    1. Sher DJ. Cost–effectiveness studies in radiation therapy. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2010;10(5):567–582. - PubMed
    1. Verellen D, De Ridder M, Linthout N, Tournel K, Soete G, Storme G. Innovations in image-guided radiotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2007;7(12):949–960. Excellent review that discusses the technological advances in radiation therapy delivery. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources