Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Dec;16 Suppl 2(0 2):360-9.
doi: 10.1007/s10995-012-1167-8.

Developing a standard approach to examine infant mortality: findings from the State Infant Mortality Collaborative (SIMC)

Affiliations

Developing a standard approach to examine infant mortality: findings from the State Infant Mortality Collaborative (SIMC)

Caroline Stampfel et al. Matern Child Health J. 2012 Dec.

Abstract

States can improve pregnancy outcomes by using a standard approach to assess infant mortality. The State Infant Mortality Collaborative (SIMC) developed a series of analyses to describe infant mortality in states, identify contributing factors to infant death, and develop the evidence base for implementing new or modifying existing programs and policies addressing infant mortality. The SIMC was conducted between 2004 and 2006 among five states: Delaware, Hawaii, Louisiana, Missouri, and North Carolina. States used analytic strategies in an iterative process to investigate contributors to infant mortality. Analyses were conducted within three domains: data reporting (quality, reporting, definitional criteria, and timeliness), cause and timing of infant death (classification of cause and fetal, neonatal, and postneonatal timing), and maturity and weight at birth/maturity and birth weight-specific mortality. All states identified the SIMC analyses as useful for examining infant mortality trends. In each of the three domains, SIMC results were used to identify important direct contributors to infant mortality including disparities, design or implement interventions to reduce infant death, and identify foci for additional analyses. While each state has unique structural, political, and programmatic circumstances, the SIMC model provides a systematic approach to investigating increasing or static infant mortality rates that can be easily replicated in all other states and allows for cross-state comparison of results.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Perinatal periods of risk (PPOR) classification of infant deaths. Used with permission, www.citymatch.org/ppor_index.php [46]
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Kitagawa analysis: conceptual calculation and definition. Created from the perinatal periods of risk (PPOR) phase II analysis protocol for this publication [46]

References

    1. Murphy SL, Xu JQ, Kochanek KD. Deaths: Preliminary data for 2010. National Vital Statistics Reports. 2012;60:1–69. - PubMed
    1. Mathews TJ, Menacker F, MacDorman MF. Infant mortality statistics from the 2002 period: Linked birth/infant death data set. National Vital Statistics Reports. 2004;53:1–29. - PubMed
    1. Association of Maternal & Child Health Programs (AMCHP) Paper presented at: First annual meeting of the State Infant Mortality Collaborative; September 20–21; Atlanta, GA. 2004.
    1. Phelan ST, Goldenberg R, Alexander G, et al. Perinatal mortality and its relationship to the reporting of low-birth weight infants. American Journal of Public Health. 1998;88:1236–1239. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wilson AL, Fenton LJ, Munson DP. State reporting of live births of newborns weighing less than 500 grams: Impact on neonatal mortality rates. Pediatrics. 1986;78:850–854. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources