Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2012 Oct 30:12:922.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-922.

Understanding burnout according to individual differences: ongoing explanatory power evaluation of two models for measuring burnout types

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Understanding burnout according to individual differences: ongoing explanatory power evaluation of two models for measuring burnout types

Jesús Montero-Marín et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: The classic determination of burnout is by means of the dimensions exhaustion, cynicism and inefficacy. A new definition of the syndrome is based on clinical subtypes, consisting of "frenetic" (involved, ambitious, overloaded), "underchallenged" (indifferent, bored, with lack of personal development) and "worn-out" (neglectful, unacknowledged, with little control). The dimensions of overload, lack of development and neglect form a shortened version of this perspective. The aims of this study were to estimate and to compare the explanatory power of both typological models, short and long, with the standard measurement.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional survey with a randomly sample of university employees (n=409). Multivariate linear regression models were constructed between the "Maslach Burnout Inventory General Survey" (MBI-GS) dimensions, as dependent variables, and the "Burnout Clinical Subtype Questionnaire" (BCSQ-36 and BCSQ-12) dimensions, as independent variables.

Results: The BCSQ-36 subscales together explained 53% of 'exhaustion' (p<0.001), 59% of 'cynicism' (p<0.001) and 37% of 'efficacy' (p<0.001), while BCSQ-12 subscales explained 44% of 'exhaustion' (p<0.001), 44% of 'cynicism' (p<0.001), and 30% of 'efficacy' (p<0.001). The difference in the explanatory power of both models was significant for 'exhaustion' (p<0.001), and for 'cynicism' (p<0.001) and 'efficacy (p<0.001).

Conclusions: Both BCSQ-36 and BCSQ-12 demonstrate great explanatory power over the standard MBI-GS, while offering a useful characterization of the syndrome for the evaluation and design of interventions tailored to the characteristics of each individual. The BCSQ-36 may be very useful in mental health services, given that it provides a good deal of information, while the BCSQ-12 could be used as a screening measure in primary care consultations owing to its simplicity and functional nature.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Nakao M. Work-related stress and psychosomatic medicine. Biopsychosoc Med. 2010;4(1):4. doi: 10.1186/1751-0759-4-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. European Agency for Safety and Health at Work. Stress at work: facts and figures. 2009. Retrieved from: http://osha.europa.eu/en/publications/reports/TE-81-08-478-ENC_OSH_in_fi....
    1. Schaufeli WB, Buunk BP. In: Handbook of work and health psychology. Schabracq MJ, Winnubst JAM, Cooper CL, editor. Wiley, Chichester; 2002. Burnout: An overview of 25 years of research and theorizing; pp. 383–425.
    1. Gil-Monte PR. El síndrome de Quemarse por el Trabajo (burnout). Una enfermedad laboral en la sociedad del bienestar. Pirámide, Madrid; 2005.
    1. Maslach C, Schaufeli WB, Leiter MP. Job Burnout. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:397–422. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types