Are homology models sufficiently good for free-energy simulations?
- PMID: 23113602
- DOI: 10.1021/ci300349s
Are homology models sufficiently good for free-energy simulations?
Abstract
In this paper, I evaluate the usefulness of protein homology models in rigorous free-energy simulations to determine ligand affinities. Two templates were used to create models of the factor Xa protein and one template was used for dihydrofolate reductase from Plasmodium falciparum. Then, the relative free energies for several pairs of ligands were estimated using thermodynamic integration with the homology models as starting point of the simulation. These binding affinities were compared to affinities obtained when using published crystal structures as starting point of the simulations. Encouragingly, the differences between the affinities obtained when starting from either homology models or crystal structure were not statistical significant for a majority of the considered pairs of ligands. Differences between 1 and 2 kJ/mol were observed for the dihydrofolate reductase ligands and differences between 0 and 8 kJ/mol were observed for the factor Xa ligands. The largest difference for factor Xa was caused by an erroneous modeling of a loop region close to two of the ligands, and it was only observed when using one of the templates. Therefore, it is advisible to always use more than one template when creating homology models if they should be used in free-energy simulations.
Similar articles
-
Binding affinities of factor Xa inhibitors estimated by thermodynamic integration and MM/GBSA.J Chem Inf Model. 2011 Apr 25;51(4):947-58. doi: 10.1021/ci100458f. Epub 2011 Mar 18. J Chem Inf Model. 2011. PMID: 21417269
-
In silico screening against wild-type and mutant Plasmodium falciparum dihydrofolate reductase.J Mol Graph Model. 2008 Apr;26(7):1145-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2007.10.006. Epub 2007 Oct 18. J Mol Graph Model. 2008. PMID: 18037315
-
Exploring PfDHFR reaction surface: A combined molecular dynamics and QM/MM analysis.J Mol Graph Model. 2019 Mar;87:76-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2018.11.007. Epub 2018 Nov 26. J Mol Graph Model. 2019. PMID: 30508692
-
Towards understanding the mechanisms of molecular recognition by computer simulations of ligand-protein interactions.J Mol Recognit. 1999 Nov-Dec;12(6):371-89. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1352(199911/12)12:6<371::AID-JMR479>3.0.CO;2-O. J Mol Recognit. 1999. PMID: 10611647 Review.
-
Free energy calculations and ligand binding.Adv Protein Chem. 2003;66:123-58. doi: 10.1016/s0065-3233(03)66004-3. Adv Protein Chem. 2003. PMID: 14631818 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Relative Binding Free Energy Calculations Applied to Protein Homology Models.J Chem Inf Model. 2016 Dec 27;56(12):2388-2400. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.6b00362. Epub 2016 Nov 18. J Chem Inf Model. 2016. PMID: 28024402 Free PMC article.
-
Alchemical Free Energy Calculations to Investigate Protein-Protein Interactions: the Case of the CDC42/PAK1 Complex.J Chem Inf Model. 2022 Jun 27;62(12):3023-3033. doi: 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c00348. Epub 2022 Jun 9. J Chem Inf Model. 2022. PMID: 35679463 Free PMC article.
-
The molecular basis of ligand interaction at free fatty acid receptor 4 (FFA4/GPR120).J Biol Chem. 2014 Jul 18;289(29):20345-58. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.561449. Epub 2014 May 24. J Biol Chem. 2014. PMID: 24860101 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources