Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 Nov-Dec;27(2):94-102.
doi: 10.4278/ajhp.110603-QUAN-238.

Addressing weight gain in smoking cessation treatment: a randomized controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Addressing weight gain in smoking cessation treatment: a randomized controlled trial

Terry Bush et al. Am J Health Promot. 2012 Nov-Dec.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of a cognitive behavioral treatment (CBT) addressing cessation-related weight concerns delivered via a tobacco quitline that does not address weight concerns.

Design: Randomized controlled trial, blinded 6-month follow-up.

Setting: The Oklahoma Tobacco Helpline (OKHL).

Subjects: All 7998 smokers who called the OKHL were screened; 4240 were eligible; 2000 were randomized to the standard quitline (STD) or the brief version of the CBT weight concerns program (WCP).

Intervention: Telephone counseling to help people quit smoking and address concerns about cessation-related weight gain.

Measures: Demographics, weight, tobacco status, weight concerns, self-efficacy in quitting, and quitting without weight gain.

Analysis: Descriptive statistics and logistic regression.

Results: Of those randomized, 1002 participants completed the 6-month survey (response rates = 53.2% for STD, 47% for WCP). Compared with STD, WCP led to reduced weight concerns (p < .01) and less weight gain among quitters (1.8 vs. -3.4 pounds; p = .01). Although not significant, participants in the WCP were more likely to report 30-day abstinence (33.3% vs. 36.8%, p = .24; intent to treat = 17.7 vs. 17.3).

Conclusion: The WCP was successfully delivered via a quitline and resulted in improved attitudes about weight and decreased cessation-related weight gain without harming quit rates. Promotion of a quitline focused on addressing weight in conjunction with quitline treatment for smoking cessation may improve cessation and weight outcomes. Study limitations include use of self-report and survey response.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01162577.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Study Enrollment

References

    1. Finkelstein EA, Fiebelkorn IC, Wang G. National medical spending attributable to overweight and obesity: how much, and who’s paying? Health Aff (Millwood). 2003;Suppl Web Exclusives:W3–219–W3–226. - PubMed
    1. Freedman DM, Sigurdson AJ, Rajaraman P, et al. The mortality risk of smoking and obesity combined. Am J Prev Med. 2006;31:355–362. - PubMed
    1. Dall TM, Zhang Y, Chen YJ, et al. Cost associated with being overweight and with obesity, high alcohol consumption, and tobacco use within the military health system’s TRICARE prime-enrolled population. Am J Health Promot. 2007;22:120–139. - PubMed
    1. Zhu S, Anderson CM, Tedeschi GJ, et al. Evidence of real-world effectiveness of a telephone quitline for smokers. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1087–1093. - PubMed
    1. Fiore MC, Jaen CR, Baker TB, et al. Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: 2008 Update. Clinical practice guideline. Rockville, MD: US Dept of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service; 2008.

Publication types

Associated data