Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2011 Dec;36(4):242-53.

Evidence-based evaluation of physiological effects of standing and walking in individuals with spinal cord injury

Affiliations

Evidence-based evaluation of physiological effects of standing and walking in individuals with spinal cord injury

Mohammad Taghi Karimi. Iran J Med Sci. 2011 Dec.

Abstract

Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) is damage to spinal cord, which is categorized according to the extent of functional loss, sensation loss and inability of the subjects to stand and walk. The patients use two transportation systems including orthosis and wheelchair. It was claimed that standing and walking bring some benefits such as decreasing bone osteoporosis, prevention of pressure sores, and improvement of the function of the digestive system for SCI patients. Nevertheless, the question of wether or not there is enough evidence to support the effect of walking with orthosis on the health status of the subjects with SCI remains unanswered. In order to answer this question a review of the relevant literature was carried out. The review of the literature showed that evidence reported in the literature regarding the effectiveness of orthoses for improving the health condition of SCI patients was controversial. Many investigators had only used the comments of the users of orthoses. The benefits mentioned in various research studies regarding the use of orthosis included decreasing bone osteoprosis, preventing joint deformity, improving bowl and bladder function, improving digestive system function, decreasing muscle spasm, improving independent living, and improving respiratory and cardiovascular systems function. The findings of the studies reviewed also showed that improving the independent living and physiological health of the subjects were the only two benefits, which were supported by strong evidence. The review of the literature suggests that most published studies are in fact surveys, which collected questionnaire-based information from the users of orthosis.

Keywords: Spinal cord injury; bone density; bone mineral density; orthosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The algorithm of search and selection of papers to include in the review

References

    1. Zampa A, Zacquini S, Rosin C, et al. Relationship between neurological level and functional recovery in spinal cord injury patients after rehabilitation. Europa Medicophysica. 2003;39:69–78.
    1. Stolov WC, Clowers MR. Handbook of severe disability: a text for rehabilitation counselors, other vocational practitioners, and allied health professionals. Washington: U.S. Dept. of Education Rehabilitation Services Administration; 1981. pp. 322–3.
    1. Capaul M, Zollinger H, Satz N, et al. Analyses of 94 consecutive spinal cord injury patients using ASIA definition and modified Frankel score classification. Paraplegia. 1994;32:583–7. - PubMed
    1. Surkin J, Gilbert BJ, et al. Spinal cord injury in Mississippi. Findings and evaluation, 1992-1994. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000;25:716–21. - PubMed
    1. Sutton NG. Injuries of the spinal cord the management of paraplegia and tetraplegia. London: Butterworths; 1973.

LinkOut - more resources