Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2013 Sep 30;168(2):795-802.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.10.010. Epub 2012 Oct 30.

Identifying patients for early discharge: performance of decision rules among patients with acute chest pain

Simon A Mahler  1 , Chadwick D Miller, Judd E Hollander, John T Nagurney, Robert Birkhahn, Adam J Singer, Nathan I Shapiro, Ted Glynn, Richard Nowak, Basmah Safdar, Mary Peberdy, Francis L Counselman, Abhinav Chandra, Joshua Kosowsky, James Neuenschwander, Jon W Schrock, Stephen Plantholt, Deborah B Diercks, W Frank Peacock
Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Identifying patients for early discharge: performance of decision rules among patients with acute chest pain

Simon A Mahler et al. Int J Cardiol. .

Abstract

Background: The HEART score and North American Chest Pain Rule (NACPR) are decision rules designed to identify acute chest pain patients for early discharge without stress testing or cardiac imaging. This study compares the clinical utility of these decision rules combined with serial troponin determinations.

Methods and results: A secondary analysis was conducted of 1005 participants in the Myeloperoxidase In the Diagnosis of Acute coronary syndromes Study (MIDAS). MIDAS is a prospective observational cohort of Emergency Department (ED) patients enrolled from 18 US sites with symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The ability to identify participants for early discharge and the sensitivity for ACS at 30 days were compared among an unstructured assessment, NACPR, and HEART score, each combined with troponin measures at 0 and 3h. ACS, defined as cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction, or unstable angina, occurred in 22% of the cohort. The unstructured assessment identified 13.5% (95% CI 11.5-16%) of participants for early discharge with 98% (95% CI 95-99%) sensitivity for ACS. The NACPR identified 4.4% (95% CI 3-6%) for early discharge with 100% (95% CI 98-100%) sensitivity for ACS. The HEART score identified 20% (95% CI 18-23%) for early discharge with 99% (95% CI 97-100%) sensitivity for ACS. The HEART score had a net reclassification improvement of 10% (95% CI 8-12%) versus unstructured assessment and 19% (95% CI 17-21%) versus NACPR.

Conclusions: The HEART score with 0 and 3 hour serial troponin measures identifies a substantial number of patients for early discharge while maintaining high sensitivity for ACS.

Keywords: Acute coronary syndrome; Chest pain; Clinical decision rules; Risk stratification.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The North American Chest Pain Rule (NACPR) and the HEART score. NACPR: a patient is considered low-risk if they have none of the high risk criteria. The HEART score: Low-risk= 0-3, High risk= 4 or greater. Risk factors include currently treated diabetes mellitus, current or recent (<90 days) smoker, diagnosed and/or treated hypertension, diagnosed hypercholesterolemia, family history of coronary artery disease, obesity (body mass index >30), or a history of significant atherosclerosis (coronary revascularization, myocardial infarction, stroke, or peripheral arterial disease). ECG = electrocardiogram, ACS = acute coronary syndrome.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Study flow diagram: numbers of patients enrolled, excluded, and with complete data. MIDAS= Myeloperoxidase In the Diagnosis of Acute coronary syndromes Study, NACPR=North American Chest Pain Rule.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Number of ACS events at 30 days. AMI, unstable angina, and cardiac deaths, missed by each risk stratification strategy. ACS = acute coronary syndrome, AMI= acute myocardial infarction.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM, Bridges CR, Califf RM, Casey DE, Jr., et al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST-Elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction) developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:e1–e157. - PubMed
    1. Wright RS, Anderson JL, Adams CD, Bridges CR, Casey DE, Jr., Ettinger SM, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA Focused Update of the Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (Updating the 2007 Guideline): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2011;123:2022–60. - PubMed
    1. Lyon R, Morris AC, Caesar D, Gray S, Gray A. Chest pain presenting to the Emergency Department--to stratify risk with GRACE or TIMI? Resuscitation. 2007;74:90–3. - PubMed
    1. O’Connor RE, Bossaert L, Arntz HR, Brooks SC, Diercks D, Feitosa-Filho G, et al. Part 9: acute coronary syndromes: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. Circulation. 2010;122:S422–65. - PubMed
    1. Hollander JE, Blomkalns AL, Brogan GX, Diercks DB, Field JM, Garvey JL, et al. Standardized reporting guidelines for studies evaluating risk stratification of emergency department patients with potential acute coronary syndromes. Ann Emerg Med. 2004;44:589–98. - PubMed

Publication types