Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012;7(10):e47279.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047279. Epub 2012 Oct 31.

Emotional speech processing at the intersection of prosody and semantics

Affiliations

Emotional speech processing at the intersection of prosody and semantics

Rachel Schwartz et al. PLoS One. 2012.

Abstract

The ability to accurately perceive emotions is crucial for effective social interaction. Many questions remain regarding how different sources of emotional cues in speech (e.g., prosody, semantic information) are processed during emotional communication. Using a cross-modal emotional priming paradigm (Facial affect decision task), we compared the relative contributions of processing utterances with single-channel (prosody-only) versus multi-channel (prosody and semantic) cues on the perception of happy, sad, and angry emotional expressions. Our data show that emotional speech cues produce robust congruency effects on decisions about an emotionally related face target, although no processing advantage occurred when prime stimuli contained multi-channel as opposed to single-channel speech cues. Our data suggest that utterances with prosodic cues alone and utterances with combined prosody and semantic cues both activate knowledge that leads to emotional congruency (priming) effects, but that the convergence of these two information sources does not always heighten access to this knowledge during emotional speech processing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Examples of prime and target stimuli presented in the pre-semantic and post-semantic conditions.
For expository purposes, the pre-semantic condition shows a congruent “YES” trial and corresponding “NO” trial, whereas the post-semantic condition shows an incongruent “YES” trial and “NO” trial.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Effects of prime type on response latencies.
Effects of congruent, incongruent, and neutral voice primes on facial affect decision latencies (in milliseconds) made immediately prior to the emotional semantic word onset (pre-semantic condition) and immediately following the emotional semantic word (post-semantic condition). Error bars display the standard error of the means.

References

    1. Barrett LF, Lindquist KA, Gendron M (2007) Language as context for the perception of emotion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11: 327–332. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ekman P (1993) Facial expression and emotion. American Psychologist 48: 384–392. - PubMed
    1. Etcoff NL, Magee JL (1992) Categorical perception of facial expressions. Cognition 44: 227–240. - PubMed
    1. Pell MD (2001) Influence of emotion and focus location on prosody in matched statements and questions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 109: 1668–1680. - PubMed
    1. Schirmer A, Kotz SA, Friederici AD (2002) Sex differentiates the role of emotional prosody during word processing. Cognitive Brain Research 14: 228–233. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources