Identifying Community Needs and Resources in a Native Community: A Research Partnership in the Pacific Northwest
- PMID: 23123765
- PMCID: PMC3487410
- DOI: 10.1007/s11469-009-9233-1
Identifying Community Needs and Resources in a Native Community: A Research Partnership in the Pacific Northwest
Abstract
Indigenous communities have engaged in needs and resources assessments for thousands of years. By blending CBPR/TPR approaches with community-driven assets and needs assessments, academic and community based researchers can work together to better understand and identify community strengths as well as issues of concern in Native communities. This best practice approach can set research agendas that are relevant to Native communities and result in interventions and health promotion programs that are respectful of Tribal sovereignty and that incorporate unique traditions and strengths of Native communities. A successful research partnership to develop and implement a needs and resources assessment using CBPR/TPR approaches is presented using a case study that can be used as a model for other research partnerships.
References
-
- Alaska Native Science Commission Code of Research Ethics. 1997 Retrieved February 21, 2007, from http://www.nativescience.org/html/Code%20of%20Research%20Ethics.html.
-
- Allen J, Mohatt GV, Rasmus SM, Hazel KL, Thomas L, Lindley S. The tools to understand: community as co-researcher on culture-specific protective factors for Alaska natives. Journal of Prevention & Intervention in the Community. 2006;32(1-2):41–59. - PubMed
-
- American Indian Law Center, I. Model tribal research code. American Indian Law Center, Inc.; Albuquerque: 1999. Document Number.
-
- Beals J, Manson SM, Mitchell CM, Spicer P. Cultural specificity and comparison in psychiatric epidemiology: walking the tightrope in American Indian research. Culture Medicine and Psychiatry. 2003;27(3):259–289. - PubMed
-
- Brugge D, Missaghian M. Protecting the Navajo people through tribal regulation of research. Science and Engineering Ethics. 2006;12(3):491–507. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources