Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Jan;8(1):82-9.
doi: 10.2215/CJN.00010112. Epub 2012 Nov 2.

Effect of hemodiafiltration on quality of life over time

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Effect of hemodiafiltration on quality of life over time

Albert H A Mazairac et al. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013 Jan.

Abstract

Background and objectives: It is unclear if hemodiafiltration leads to a better quality of life compared with hemodialysis. It was, therefore, the aim of this study to assess the effect of hemodiafiltration on quality of life compared with hemodialysis in patients with ESRD.

Design, setting, participants, & measurements: This study analyzed the data of 714 patients with a median follow-up of 2 years from the Convective Transport Study. The patients were enrolled between June of 2004 and December of 2009. The Convective Transport Study is a randomized controlled trial on the effect of online hemodiafiltration versus low-flux hemodialysis on all-cause mortality. Quality of life was assessed with the Kidney Disease Quality of Life-Short Form. This questionnaire provides data for a physical and mental composite score and describes kidney disease-specific quality of life in 12 domains. The domains have scales from 0 to 100.

Results: There were no significant differences in changes in health-related quality of life over time between patients treated with hemodialysis (n=358) or hemodiafiltration (n=356). The quality of life domain patient satisfaction declined over time in both dialysis modalities (hemodialysis: -2.5/yr, -3.4 to -1.5, P<0.001; hemodiafiltration: -1.4/yr, -2.4 to -0.5, P=0.004).

Conclusions: Compared with hemodialysis, hemodiafiltration had no significant effect on quality of life over time.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Patient flow diagram. Because patients were included at different points in time, potential follow-up time varies per patient. The median follow-up of these patients was 2.0 years (interquartile range=1.1–3.0). The line between consecutive years of follow-up is dashed to point out that a measurement was sometimes skipped (e.g., 17 patients did not fill out the KDQOL-SF at baseline but did fill it out after 1 year of follow-up). HD, hemodialysis; HDF, hemodiafiltration; HRQOL, health-related quality of life; KDQOL-SF, Kidney Disease Quality of Life—Short Form; PD, peritoneal dialysis.

Comment in

References

    1. Testa MA, Simonson DC: Assesment of quality-of-life outcomes. N Engl J Med 334: 835–840, 1996 - PubMed
    1. Hemodialysis Adequacy 2006 Work Group : Clinical practice guidelines for hemodialysis adequacy, update 2006. Am J Kidney Dis 48[Suppl 1]: S2–S90, 2006 - PubMed
    1. Mittal SK, Ahern L, Flaster E, Maesaka JK, Fishbane S: Self-assessed physical and mental function of haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 16: 1387–1394, 2001 - PubMed
    1. Kalantar-Zadeh K, Kopple JD, Block G, Humphreys MH: Association among SF36 quality of life measures and nutrition, hospitalization, and mortality in hemodialysis. J Am Soc Nephrol 12: 2797–2806, 2001 - PubMed
    1. Knight EL, Ofsthun N, Teng M, Lazarus JM, Curhan GC: The association between mental health, physical function, and hemodialysis mortality. Kidney Int 63: 1843–1851, 2003 - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data