Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2013 Feb 20;31(6):744-51.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.8820. Epub 2012 Nov 5.

Randomized phase III trial of induction chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil followed by surgery versus up-front surgery in locally advanced resectable oral squamous cell carcinoma

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Randomized phase III trial of induction chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil followed by surgery versus up-front surgery in locally advanced resectable oral squamous cell carcinoma

Lai-ping Zhong et al. J Clin Oncol. .

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate induction chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (TPF) followed by surgery and postoperative radiotherapy versus up-front surgery and postoperative radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced resectable oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).

Patients and methods: A prospective open-label phase III trial was conducted. Eligibility criteria included untreated stage III or IVA locally advanced resectable OSCC. Patients received two cycles of TPF induction chemotherapy (docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) on day 1, cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) on day 1, and fluorouracil 750 mg/m(2) on days 1 to 5) followed by radical surgery and postoperative radiotherapy (54 to 66 Gy) versus up-front radical surgery and postoperative radiotherapy. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included local control and safety.

Results: Of the 256 patients enrolled onto this trial, 222 completed the full treatment protocol. There were no unexpected toxicities, and induction chemotherapy did not increase perioperative morbidity. The clinical response rate to induction chemotherapy was 80.6%. After a median follow-up of 30 months, there was no significant difference in OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.977; 95% CI, 0.634 to 1.507; P = .918) or disease-free survival (HR, 0.974; 95% CI, 0.654 to 1.45; P = .897) between patients treated with and without TPF induction. Patients in the induction chemotherapy arm with a clinical response or favorable pathologic response (≤ 10% viable tumor cells) had superior OS and locoregional and distant control.

Conclusion: Our study failed to demonstrate that TPF induction chemotherapy improves survival compared with up-front surgery in patients with resectable stage III or IVA OSCC.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01542931.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.

Figures

Fig 1.
Fig 1.
CONSORT diagram.
Fig 2.
Fig 2.
(A) Overall and (B) disease-free survival in the control and experimental arms. TPF, docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil.
Fig 3.
Fig 3.
Subgroup analysis of (A) overall and disease-free survival and (B) locoregional recurrence–free and distant metastasis–free survival in the control and experimental arms. HR, hazard ratio; M/P, moderately/poorly.
Fig A1.
Fig A1.
(A) Locoregional recurrence–free and (B) distant metastasis–free survival in the control and experimental arms. TPF, docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil.
Fig A2.
Fig A2.
(A to D) Pathologic and (E to H) clinical response for (A, E) overall, (B, F) disease-free, (C, G) locoregional recurrence–free, and (D, H) distant metastasis–free survival. The landmark point was set at the time of response evaluation.

Comment in

References

    1. Kademani D: Oral cancer Mayo Clin Proc 82:878–887,2007 - PubMed
    1. Petersen PE: The World Oral Health Report 2003: Continuous improvement of oral health in the 21st century—The approach of WHO Global Oral Programme Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 31:3–23,2003. suppl 1 - PubMed
    1. Neville BW, Day TA: Oral cancer and precancerous lesions CA Cancer J Clin 52:195–215,2002 - PubMed
    1. Parkin DM Bray F Ferlay J, etal: Global cancer statistics, 2002 CA Cancer J Clin 55:74–108,2005 - PubMed
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network: NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Head and Neck Cancers (version 1.2012) http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/head-and-neck.pdf. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data