Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Nov;94(8):585-7.
doi: 10.1308/003588412X13373405386538.

How safe is diathermy in patients with cochlear implants?

Affiliations

How safe is diathermy in patients with cochlear implants?

S J Frampton et al. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2012 Nov.

Abstract

Introduction: Cochlear implants are surgically inserted electrical devices that enable severely or profoundly deaf individuals to interpret sounds from their environment and communicate more effectively. As a result of their electrical nature, they are susceptible to electromagnetic interference and can be damaged by excessive electrical energy. Surgical diathermy is one source of such potentially damaging energy. The British Cochlear Implant Group guidelines advise that monopolar diathermy should not be used in the head and neck region in patients with cochlear implants and that bipolar diathermy should not be used within 2cm of the implant (http://www.bcig.org.uk/site/public/current/safety.htm).

Methods: A questionnaire was provided to 36 surgeons working in different specialties in the head and neck region, inquiring as to their knowledge of the safety considerations when using diathermy in cochlear implant patients. Thirty-five surgeons provided responses.

Results: Overall, 77% of the respondents were unaware of the existence of published guidelines. Even when given an option to seek advice, 11% erroneously felt it was safe to use monopolar diathermy above the clavicles with a cochlear implant in situ and 49% felt that there was no restriction on the use of bipolar diathermy.

Conclusions: There is a significant deficit in the knowledge of safe operating practice in the rapidly expanding population of patients with cochlear implants which threatens patient safety. Through this publication we aim to increase awareness of these guidelines among members of the surgical community and this paper is intended to act as a point of reference to link through to the published safety guidelines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic diagram of cochlear implant in situ

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ramsden RT, Wheatley H. Developing surgical techniques in cochlear implantation. Cochlear Implants Int 2000; 1: 67–81 - PubMed
    1. Venail F, Sicard M, Piron JPet al.Reliability and complications of 500 consecutive cochlear implantations. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008; 134: 1,276–1,281 - PubMed
    1. Ear Foundation Cochlear Implants: 2011. Nottingham: Ear Foundation; 2011
    1. National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders NIDCD Fact Sheet: Cochlear Implants. Bethesda, MD: NIDCD; 2011
    1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Cochlear Implants for Children and Adults with Severe to Profound Deafness. London: NICE; 2009