Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Nov;9(11):652-64.
doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2012.185.

The complexity of prostate cancer: genomic alterations and heterogeneity

Affiliations
Review

The complexity of prostate cancer: genomic alterations and heterogeneity

Lara K Boyd et al. Nat Rev Urol. 2012 Nov.

Abstract

Although prostate cancer is the most common malignancy to affect men in the Western world, the molecular mechanisms underlying its development and progression remain poorly understood. Like all cancers, prostate cancer is a genetic disease that is characterized by multiple genomic alterations, including point mutations, microsatellite variations, and chromosomal alterations such as translocations, insertions, duplications, and deletions. In prostate cancer, but not other carcinomas, these chromosome alterations result in a high frequency of gene fusion events. The development and application of novel high-resolution technologies has significantly accelerated the detection of genomic alterations, revealing the complex nature and heterogeneity of the disease. The clinical heterogeneity of prostate cancer can be partly explained by this underlying genetic heterogeneity, which has been observed between patients from different geographical and ethnic populations, different individuals within these populations, different tumour foci within the same patient, and different cells within the same tumour focus. The highly heterogeneous nature of prostate cancer provides a real challenge for clinical disease management and a detailed understanding of the genetic alterations in all cells, including small subpopulations, would be highly advantageous.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Cell Biochem. 2006 Feb 15;97(3):433-47 - PubMed
    1. Mod Pathol. 2004 Mar;17(3):292-306 - PubMed
    1. Urology. 1995 Dec;46(6):837-42 - PubMed
    1. Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Mar;66(3):945-57 - PubMed
    1. Cancer. 1992 Nov 1;70(9):2313-8 - PubMed

Substances