Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Nov 6;107(10):1665-71.
doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.385.

Concomitant oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors and bisphosphonates in advanced renal cell carcinoma with bone metastases

Affiliations

Concomitant oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors and bisphosphonates in advanced renal cell carcinoma with bone metastases

B Beuselinck et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: The presence of bone metastases in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is associated with poorer outcome as compared with patients without bone involvement. Concomitant bisphosphonates could probably improve outcomes but also induce osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ).

Methods: Retrospective study on all the renal cell carcinoma patients with bone metastases treated with sunitinib or sorafenib between November 2005 and June 2012 at the University Hospitals Leuven and AZ Groeninge in Kortrijk.

Results: Seventy-six patients were included in the outcome analysis: 49 treated with concomitant bisphosphonates, 27 with TKI alone. Both groups were well balanced in terms of prognostic and predictive markers. Response rate (38% vs 16% partial responses, P=0.028), median progression-free survival (7.0 vs 4.0 months, P=0.0011) and median overall survival (17.0 vs 7.0 months, P=0.022) were significantly better in patients receiving bisphosphonates. The incidence of ONJ was 10% in patients treated with TKI and bisphosphonates.

Conclusion: Concomitant use of bisphosphonates and TKI in renal cell carcinoma patients with bone involvement probably improves treatment efficacy, to be confirmed by prospective studies, but is associated with a high incidence of ONJ.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PFS according to concomitant bisphosphonate use.
Figure 2
Figure 2
OS according to concomitant bisphosphonates use.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ayllon J, Launay-Vacher V, Medioni J, Cros C, Spano JP, Oudard S (2009) Osteonecrosis of the jaw under bisphosphonate and antiangiogenic therapies: cumulative toxicity profile? Ann Oncol 20(3): 600–601 - PubMed
    1. Bamias A, Kastritis E, Bamia C, Moulopoulos LA, Melakopoulos I, Bozas G, Koutsoukou V, Gika D, Anagnostopoulos A, Papadimitriou C, Terpos E, Dimopoulos MA (2005) Osteonecrosis of the jaw in cancer after treatment with bisphosphonates: incidence and risk factors. J Clin Oncol 23(34): 8580–8587 - PubMed
    1. Beuselinck B, Oudard S, Rixe O, Wolter P, Blesius A, Ayllon J, Elaidi R, Schöffski P, Barrascout E, Morel A, Escudier B, Lang H, Zucman-Rossi J, Medioni J (2011) ‘Negative impact of bone metastasis on outcome in clear cell renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib’. Ann Oncol 22(4): 794–800 - PubMed
    1. Bozas G, Allgar V, Greenwood G, Maraveyas A (2011) Osteonecrosis of the jaw in patients treated with sunitinib and zoledronic acid. J Clin Oncol 29(Suppl): abstract e15116
    1. Christodoulou C, Pervena A, Klouvas G, Galani E, Falagas ME, Tsakalos G, Visvikis A, Nikolakopoulou A, Acholos V, Karapanagiotidis G, Batziou E, Skarlos DV (2009) Combination of bisphosphonates and antiangiogenic factors induces osteonecrosis of the jaw more frequently than bisphosphonates alone. Oncology 76(3): 209–211 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms