Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Dec;71(6):356-62.
doi: 10.1007/s12262-009-0094-4. Epub 2010 Jan 13.

Current evidence-based opinions in the management of adenocarcionoma of the rectum

Affiliations

Current evidence-based opinions in the management of adenocarcionoma of the rectum

Sergio Huerta et al. Indian J Surg. 2009 Dec.

Abstract

The management of rectal cancer has drastically evolved over the past two decades as a result of implementation of circular stapling devices and the introduction of neoadjuvant chemoradiation. In spite of current aggressive multimodality treatments, the recurrence rate remains unacceptably high and the expected 5-year survival in patients who develop recurrent disease is dismal. The management of rectal cancer must involve a multidisciplinary approach. An understanding of the biology of rectal tumours may allow for selection of patients who may have an aggressive phenotype allowing for alterations in the operative and neoadjuvant planning. Efforts to improve local control and survival in rectal cancer are the focus of multiple current clinical and preclinical research efforts. Preoperative chemoradiation for and surgical management of rectal cancer, including the laparoscopic approach are areas of dynamic progression. In the present report, we review the current evidence in the new strategies pertaining to the multimodality approach in the management of rectal cancer.

Keywords: Endorectal ultrasound; Induction chemotherapy; Laparoscopic LAR; Preoperative staging; Rectum.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Jemal A., Siegel R., Ward E., Hao Y., Xu J., Thun M.J. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:225–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.20006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yun H.R., Chun H.K., Lee W.S., Cho Y.B., Yun S.H., Lee W.Y. Intra-operative measurement of surgical lengths of the rectum and the peritoneal reflection in Korean. J Korean Med Sci. 2008;23:999–1004. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2008.23.6.999. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Najarian M.M., Belzer G.E., Cogbill T.H., Mathiason M.A. Determination of the peritoneal reflection using intraoperative proctoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:2080–2085. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0740-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wong RK, Tandan V, De SS, Figueredo A (2007) Preoperativeerative radiotherapy and curative surgery for the management of localized rectal carcinoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD002102 - PubMed
    1. Pilipshen S.J., Heilweil M., Quan S.H., Sternberg S.S., Enker W.E. Patterns of pelvic recurrence following definitive resections of rectal cancer. Cancer. 1984;53:1354–1362. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19840315)53:6<1354::AID-CNCR2820530623>3.0.CO;2-J. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources