Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Feb;17(1):48-54.
doi: 10.1111/petr.12011. Epub 2012 Nov 8.

Adaptive functioning and its correlates after intestine and liver transplantation

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Adaptive functioning and its correlates after intestine and liver transplantation

Diana A Shellmer et al. Pediatr Transplant. 2013 Feb.

Abstract

In this cross-sectional study, we compared levels of adaptive functioning and examined potential correlates of adaptive functioning in 18 pediatric intestine (ITX) and 22 liver (LTX) recipients transplanted between June 2003 and March 2009. Family caregivers completed the ABAS-II scale and provided socio-demographic information regarding recipients' age at transplantation, gender, ethnicity, time since transplantation, and caregivers' role, ethnicity, education, and family income. Overall adaptive functioning and all three adaptive functioning subdomain scores were significantly lower in ITX patients compared with LTX patients (p ≤ 0.04) and compared with the general population normative mean (p ≤ 0.003). Significant correlates of adaptive functioning after abdominal transplant included type of transplant procedure (r = -0.4, p = 0.02), gender (r = 0.4, p = 0.01), and educational level of caregiver (r = 0.5, p = 0.003) and together explained 45% of the variance in overall adaptive functioning. Findings provide new information regarding everyday functioning outcomes of ITX patients, add to existing data regarding non-medical outcomes for LTX patients, and highlight the need for ongoing monitoring and intervention following transplantation to enhance outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Adaptive Functioning Mean Scores by Transplant Type N = 40
All adaptive scores were significantly different by transplant type, liver transplant patients scored higher (p < 0.05).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Adaptive Functioning Mean Scores by Patient Gender N = 40
General Adaptive Composite (GAC), Conceptual (CON) and Practical (PR) adaptive scores were significantly different by gender, females patients scored higher (p < 0.05)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Adaptive Functioning Mean Scores by Family Caregiver Educational Level N = 40
General Adaptive Composite (GAC), Conceptual, and Social adaptive scores were significantly different based on educational level of family caregiver p < 0.05. Patients with caregivers with higher educational levels (i.e., those with more than a high school education) scored higher in these areas.

Similar articles

References

    1. Bucuvalas J. Long-term outcomes in pediatric liver transplantation. Liver Transplantation. 2009;15(S2):S6–S11. - PubMed
    1. Lao OB, Healey PJ, Perkins JD, Horslen S, Reyes JD, Goldin AB. Outcomes in Children After Intestinal Transplant. Pediatrics. 2010;125(3):e550–558. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Services UDoHaH. OPTN/SRTR Annual Report. 2008
    1. Alonso EM, Sorensen LG. Cognitive development following pediatric solid organ transplantation. Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation. 2009;14:522–525. - PubMed
    1. Gilmour S, Adkins R, Liddell GA, Jhangri G, Robertson CM. Assessment of Psychoeducational Outcomes After Pediatric Liver Transplant. American Journal of Transplantation. 2009;9(2):294–300. - PubMed

Publication types