Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Nov 8:12:955.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-955.

Public health interventions in midwifery: a systematic review of systematic reviews

Jenny McNeill  1 , Fiona Lynn, Fiona Alderdice
Affiliations

Public health interventions in midwifery: a systematic review of systematic reviews

Jenny McNeill et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Maternity care providers, particularly midwives, have a window of opportunity to influence pregnant women about positive health choices. This aim of this paper is to identify evidence of effective public health interventions from good quality systematic reviews that could be conducted by midwives.

Methods: Relevant databases including MEDLINE, Pubmed, EBSCO, CRD, MIDIRS, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library and Econlit were searched to identify systematic reviews in October 2010. Quality assessment of all reviews was conducted.

Results: Thirty-six good quality systematic reviews were identified which reported on effective interventions. The reviews were conducted on a diverse range of interventions across the reproductive continuum and were categorised under: screening; supplementation; support; education; mental health; birthing environment; clinical care in labour and breast feeding. The scope and strength of the review findings are discussed in relation to current practice. A logic model was developed to provide an overarching framework of midwifery public health roles to inform research policy and practice.

Conclusions: This review provides a broad scope of high quality systematic review evidence and definitively highlights the challenge of knowledge transfer from research into practice. The review also identified gaps in knowledge around the impact of core midwifery practice on public health outcomes and the value of this contribution. This review provides evidence for researchers and funders as to the gaps in current knowledge and should be used to inform the strategic direction of the role of midwifery in public health in policy and practice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Identification of effective reviews of high quality *some reviews which were included at the request of funder have been excluded from this paper eg economic reviews (n=6) **non significant, non effective or inconclusive reviews, reviews graded 2++,2+ or 2- and medium or low quality reviews are not discussed in this paper.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Summary Logic Model.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Midwifery 2020 Programme. Midwifery 2020: Delivering Expectations. London: Midwifery 2020; 2010.
    1. United Nations. The millennium development goals report 2008. New York: United Nations Department of Social and Economic Affairs; 2008.
    1. Thomson G, Dykes F, Singh G, Cawley L, Dey P. A public health perspective of women's experiences of antenatal care: An exploration of insights from a community consultation. Midwifery. 2012. Epub ahead of print. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Whitehead E. Understanding the association between teenage pregnancy and intergenerational factors: a comparative and analytical study. Midwifery. 2009;25:147–154. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2007.02.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Declercq E, Young R, Cabral H, Ecker J. Is a rising cesarean delivery rate inevitable? trends in industrialized countries, 1987 to 2007. Birth. 2011;38(2):99–104. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2010.00459.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources