Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Dec;21(4):419-24.
doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2012.00086.

Acceptability and feasibility of pulmonary rehabilitation for COPD: a community qualitative study

Lynda Moore  1 , Lauren Hogg, Patrick White
Affiliations

Acceptability and feasibility of pulmonary rehabilitation for COPD: a community qualitative study

Lynda Moore et al. Prim Care Respir J. 2012 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is second in importance to smoking cessation treatment in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Access to the service is limited and less than half of those referred complete the treatment.

Aims: We assessed the obstacles to participation in PR among COPD patients in a community-based PR programme and associated general practices.

Methods: A qualitative interview study was conducted among COPD patients who completed the PR treatment, those who did not complete or declined treatment, and patients never referred. Participants were invited by letter from their own general practitioners or from the PR service. Views on exercise, disease education, social contact, group activity, accessibility, location, role of referrer, and support for participation were assessed. Data were analysed using the framework approach.

Results: Twenty-four patients (28%, 13 male, 12 not referred) were interviewed. The acceptability of PR was the major concern. Feasibility of attending was an issue for some. Perceptions of PR and of exercise were highlighted. How a smoker might be seen, the suitability of group activity, and the views of professionals were influential, as were positive and negative recommendations. The location of the centre was important. Participants' willingness or reluctance to take on something new was a central element of the decision. Many would welcome the role of experienced patients in introducing the treatment.

Conclusions: For patients who refused referral to PR, had not completed a course, or had yet to be referred, the way the service was introduced was an important determinant of willingness to participate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in relation to this article.

Comment in

References

    1. National Clinical Guideline Centre. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in adults in primary and secondary care. London: National Clinical Guideline Centre, 2010, p.1–673.
    1. Lacasse Y, Goldstein R, Lasserson TJ, Martin S. Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006;(4):CD003793. - PubMed
    1. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (updated 2009). 2009. - PubMed
    1. Ries AL, Bauldoff GS, Carlin BW, et al. Pulmonary rehabilitation: joint ACCP/AACVPR evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2007;131(5 Suppl):4S–42S. http://dx.doi.org/10.1378/chest.06-2418 - PubMed
    1. Calverley PM, Anderson JA, Celli B, et al. Salmeterol and fluticasone propionate and survival in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med 2007;356(8):775–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa063070 - PubMed

Publication types