International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening (CAPS) Consortium summit on the management of patients with increased risk for familial pancreatic cancer
- PMID: 23135763
- PMCID: PMC3585492
- DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-303108
International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening (CAPS) Consortium summit on the management of patients with increased risk for familial pancreatic cancer
Erratum in
- Gut. 2014 Dec;63(12):1978. Hammell, Pascal [corrected to Hammel, Pascal]
- Gut. 2014 Jan;63(1):178. Hamell, Pascal [corrected to Hammell, Pascal]
Abstract
Background: Screening individuals at increased risk for pancreatic cancer (PC) detects early, potentially curable, pancreatic neoplasia.
Objective: To develop consortium statements on screening, surveillance and management of high-risk individuals with an inherited predisposition to PC.
Methods: A 49-expert multidisciplinary international consortium met to discuss pancreatic screening and vote on statements. Consensus was considered reached if ≥ 75% agreed or disagreed.
Results: There was excellent agreement that, to be successful, a screening programme should detect and treat T1N0M0 margin-negative PC and high-grade dysplastic precursor lesions (pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm). It was agreed that the following were candidates for screening: first-degree relatives (FDRs) of patients with PC from a familial PC kindred with at least two affected FDRs; patients with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome; and p16, BRCA2 and hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) mutation carriers with ≥ 1 affected FDR. Consensus was not reached for the age to initiate screening or stop surveillance. It was agreed that initial screening should include endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and/or MRI/magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography not CT or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. There was no consensus on the need for EUS fine-needle aspiration to evaluate cysts. There was disagreement on optimal screening modalities and intervals for follow-up imaging. When surgery is recommended it should be performed at a high-volume centre. There was great disagreement as to which screening abnormalities were of sufficient concern to for surgery to be recommended.
Conclusions: Screening is recommended for high-risk individuals, but more evidence is needed, particularly for how to manage patients with detected lesions. Screening and subsequent management should take place at high-volume centres with multidisciplinary teams, preferably within research protocols.
Comment in
-
Limited resection of pancreatic cancer in high-risk patients can result in a second primary.Gut. 2015 Aug;64(8):1342-4. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309568. Epub 2015 Apr 2. Gut. 2015. PMID: 25838549 No abstract available.
References
-
- Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, et al. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011;61:69–90 - PubMed
-
- Al-Sukhni W, Borgida A, Rothenmund H, et al. Screening for Pancreatic Cancer in a High-Risk Cohort: An Eight-Year Experience. J Gastrointest Surg 2011;16:771–83. - PubMed
-
- Brentnall TA. Pancreatic cancer surveillance: learning as we go. Am J Gastroenterol 2011;106:955–6 - PubMed
-
- Canto MI, Goggins M, Hruban RH, et al. Screening for early pancreatic neoplasia in high-risk individuals: a prospective controlled study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006;4:766–81; quiz 665 - PubMed
-
- Canto M, Goggins M, Yeo C, et al. Screening for pancreatic neoplasia in high-risk individuals. Clin Gastro Hepatol 2004;2:606–21. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Supplementary concepts
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous