Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Apr;23(4):938-42.
doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2697-6. Epub 2012 Nov 9.

C-arm CT during hepatic arteriography tumour-to-liver contrast: intraindividual comparison of three different contrast media application protocols

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

C-arm CT during hepatic arteriography tumour-to-liver contrast: intraindividual comparison of three different contrast media application protocols

Claus Koelblinger et al. Eur Radiol. 2013 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: To compare tumour-to-liver contrast (TLC) of C-arm CT during hepatic arteriography (CACTHA) acquired using three protocols in patients with HCC.

Methods: This prospective study was IRB approved and informed consent was obtained from each patient. Twenty-nine patients (mean age, 68 ± 7 years; 27 men) with 55 HCCs (mean diameter, 2.6 ± 1.5 cm) underwent three different CACTHA protocols in random order before chemoembolisation. Contrast medium (100 mg iodine/ml) was injected into the common hepatic artery (flow rate 4 ml/s). The imaging delay for the start of the CACTHA examination was 4 s (protocol A), 8 s (protocol B) and 12 s (protocol C) (total amount of injected contrast medium: 48 ml, 64 ml, 80 ml). TLC was measured by placing regions of interest (ROIs) in the HCC and liver parenchyma. Mixed model ANOVAs and Bonferroni corrected post hoc tests were used for statistical analysis.

Results: Mean values for TLC were 132 ± 3.3 HU, 186 ± 5.8 HU and 168 ± 2.8 HU for protocols A, B and C. Protocol B provided significantly higher TLC than protocols A and C (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: TLC was significantly higher using an imaging delay of 8 s compared with a delay of 4 or 12 s.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abdom Imaging. 2009 Jul;34(4):502-6 - PubMed
    1. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2007 Sep-Oct;31(5):702-11 - PubMed
    1. Radiol Phys Technol. 2011 Jan;4(1):43-52 - PubMed
    1. Hepatology. 2010 Aug;52(2):762-73 - PubMed
    1. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2009 Mar;32(2):255-64 - PubMed

Publication types