Upper oesophageal images and Z-line detection with 2 different small-bowel capsule systems
- PMID: 23139622
- PMCID: PMC3491613
- DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i41.6003
Upper oesophageal images and Z-line detection with 2 different small-bowel capsule systems
Abstract
Transmission of oesophageal images may vary between different small-bowel capsule endoscopy models. A retrospective review of 100 examinations performed with 2 different Small-bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) systems (PillCam(®) and MiroCam(®)) was performed. The oral cavity/aero-digestive tract (i.e., tongue, uvula and/or epiglottis) was captured/identified in almost all (99%) of PillCam(®) videos but in none of MiroCam(®) cases, P < 0.0001. Furthermore, oesophageal images (i.e., from the upper oesophageal sphincter to the Z-line were captured in 99% of PillCam(®) videos (mean ± SD, 60.5 ± 334.1 frames, range: 0-3329 frames) and in 66% of MiroCam(®) cases (mean ± SD, 11.1 ± 46.5 frames, range: 0-382 frames), P < 0.0001. The Z-line was identified in 42% of PillCam(®) videos and 17% of MiroCam(®), P = 0.0002. This information might be useful when performing SBCE in patients with high risks for aspiration.
Keywords: Aspiration; Capsule endoscopy; Detection; MiroCam; Oesophagus; PillCam; Transmission; Z line.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of the diagnostic yield of "MiroCam" and "PillCam SB" capsule endoscopy.Hepatogastroenterology. 2012 May;59(115):778-81. doi: 10.5754/hge10472. Hepatogastroenterology. 2012. PMID: 22469721
-
Small bowel capsule endoscopy and portal hypertensive enteropathy in cirrhotic patients: results from a tertiary referral centre.Ann Hepatol. 2016 May-Jun;15(3):394-401. doi: 10.5604/16652681.1198815. Ann Hepatol. 2016. PMID: 27049493
-
Detection of the ampulla of Vater in small bowel capsule endoscopy: experience with two different systems.J Dig Dis. 2012 Dec;13(12):621-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-2980.2012.00638.x. J Dig Dis. 2012. PMID: 23134524
-
Capsule endoscopy in patients refusing conventional endoscopy.World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun 21;20(23):7424-33. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i23.7424. World J Gastroenterol. 2014. PMID: 24966612 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Capsule endoscopy--not just for the small bowel: a review.Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Jan;9(1):79-89. doi: 10.1586/17474124.2014.934357. Epub 2014 Dec 8. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015. PMID: 25484107 Review.
Cited by
-
Looking forwards: not necessarily the best in capsule endoscopy?Ann Gastroenterol. 2013;26(4):365-367. Ann Gastroenterol. 2013. PMID: 24714324 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Lucendo AJ, González-Castillo S, Fernández-Fuente M, De Rezende LC. Tracheal aspiration of a capsule endoscope: a new case report and literature compilation of an increasingly reported complication. Dig Dis Sci. 2011;56:2758–2762. - PubMed
-
- Despott EJ, O’Rourke A, Anikin V, Davison C, Panter S, Bromley J, Plaice J, Corbett M, Fraser C. Tracheal aspiration of capsule endoscopes: detection, management, and susceptibility. Dig Dis Sci. 2012;57:1973–1974. - PubMed
-
- Koulaouzidis A, Pendlebury J, Douglas S, Plevris JN. Aspiration of video capsule: rare but potentially life-threatening complication to include in your consent form. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:1602–1603. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources