Mesh size in Lichtenstein repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the importance of mesh size
- PMID: 23142904
- DOI: 10.1007/s10029-012-1018-y
Mesh size in Lichtenstein repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the importance of mesh size
Abstract
Purpose: Small mesh size has been recognized as one of the factors responsible for recurrence after Lichtenstein hernia repair due to insufficient coverage or mesh shrinkage. The Lichtenstein Hernia Institute recommends a 7 × 15 cm mesh that can be trimmed up to 2 cm from the lateral side. We performed a systematic review to determine surgeons' mesh size preference for the Lichtenstein hernia repair and made a meta-analysis to determine the effect of mesh size, mesh type, and length of follow-up time on recurrence.
Methods: Two medical databases, PubMed and ISI Web of Science, were systematically searched using the key word "Lichtenstein repair." All full text papers were selected. Publications mentioning mesh size were brought for further analysis. A mesh surface area of 90 cm(2) was accepted as the threshold for defining the mesh as small or large. Also, a subgroup analysis for recurrence pooled proportion according to the mesh size, mesh type, and follow-up period was done.
Results: In total, 514 papers were obtained. There were no prospective or retrospective clinical studies comparing mesh size and clinical outcome. A total of 141 papers were duplicated in both databases. As a result, 373 papers were obtained. The full text was available in over 95 % of papers. Only 41 (11.2 %) papers discussed mesh size. In 29 studies, a mesh larger than 90 cm(2) was used. The most frequently preferred commercial mesh size was 7.5 × 15 cm. No papers mentioned the size of the mesh after trimming. There was no information about the relationship between mesh size and patient BMI. The pooled proportion in recurrence for small meshes was 0.0019 (95 % confidence interval: 0.007-0.0036), favoring large meshes to decrease the chance of recurrence. Recurrence becomes more marked when follow-up period is longer than 1 year (p < 0.001). Heavy meshes also decreased recurrence (p = 0.015).
Conclusion: This systematic review demonstrates that the size of the mesh used in Lichtenstein hernia repair is rarely discussed in clinical studies. Papers that discuss mesh size appear to reflect a trend to comply with the latest recommendations to use larger mesh. Standard heavy meshes decrease the recurrence in hernia repair. Even though there is no evidence, it seems that large meshes decrease recurrence rates.
Similar articles
-
Mesh fixation with glue versus suture for chronic pain and recurrence in Lichtenstein inguinal hernioplasty.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 7;2(2):CD010814. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010814.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28170080 Free PMC article.
-
Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 13;9(9):CD011517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011517.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 30209805 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2005 Apr;9(14):1-203, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9140. Health Technol Assess. 2005. PMID: 15842951
-
Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;2003(1):CD001785. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001785. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003. PMID: 12535413 Free PMC article.
-
Mesh versus non-mesh for emergency groin hernia repair.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 27;11(11):CD015160. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015160.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 38009575 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Description of robotically assisted single-site transabdominal preperitoneal (RASS-TAPP) inguinal hernia repair and presentation of clinical outcomes.Hernia. 2015 Jun;19(3):423-8. doi: 10.1007/s10029-014-1311-z. Epub 2014 Sep 24. Hernia. 2015. PMID: 25249251
-
Surgical risk factors for recurrence in inguinal hernia repair - a review of the literature.Innov Surg Sci. 2017 Apr 13;2(2):53-59. doi: 10.1515/iss-2017-0013. eCollection 2017 Jun. Innov Surg Sci. 2017. PMID: 31579737 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Causes of recurrences after open inguinal herniorrhaphy.Hernia. 2019 Aug;23(4):637-645. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1868-z. Epub 2018 Dec 5. Hernia. 2019. PMID: 30519909 Review.
-
Lichtenstein technique for inguinal hernia repair: ten recommendations to optimize surgical outcomes.Hernia. 2024 Aug;28(4):1467-1476. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03094-w. Epub 2024 Jun 20. Hernia. 2024. PMID: 38900355 Free PMC article.
-
The Lichtenstein technique is being used adequately in inguinal hernia repair: national analysis and review of the surgical technique.Rev Col Bras Cir. 2023 Dec 8;50:e20233655. doi: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20233655-en. eCollection 2023. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2023. PMID: 38088634 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials