Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Mar;131(3):544-552.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31827c6e2e.

Transdiaphragmatic omental harvest: a simple, efficient method for sternal wound coverage

Raj M Vyas  1 , Adnan Prsic, Dennis P Orgill
Affiliations

Transdiaphragmatic omental harvest: a simple, efficient method for sternal wound coverage

Raj M Vyas et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Mar.

Abstract

Background: The greater omentum is easily harvested for coverage of sternal wounds without muscle sacrifice. Its major disadvantage is a laparotomy incision with potential bowel injury, adhesions, or hernia. Over the past 20 years, the authors' technique has evolved to use a transdiaphragmatic opening for omental harvest when possible.

Methods: The authors performed a retrospective cohort analysis of 140 consecutive patients undergoing omental flap harvest for treatment of sternal wounds following median sternotomy. Patients were divided into two groups by access incision: laparotomy incision (n = 80) versus a transdiaphragmatic opening (n = 60).

Results: The authors found that both techniques provided reliable closure of sternal wounds, but the transdiaphragmatic approach was faster, with less blood loss. There was no significant difference in rates of ventral hernias. We had only one bowel injury (laparotomy group) and no postoperative abdominal bleeding or small bowel obstruction.

Conclusion: Transdiaphragmatic omental harvest provides safe and efficient coverage of deep sternal wounds without a laparotomy incision.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Hollenbeak CS, Murphy DM, Koenig S, Woodward RS, Dunagan WC, Fraser VJ. The clinical and economic impact of deep chest surgical site infections following coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Chest 2000;118:397–402.
    1. Lazar H, Fitzgerald C, Gross S, Heeren T, Aldea GS, Shemin RJ. Determinants of length of stay after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation 1995;92(Suppl):II20–II24.
    1. Ottino G, De Paulis R, Pansini S, et al.. Major sternal wound infection after open heart surgery: A multivariate analysis of risk factors in 2,579 consecutive operative procedures. Ann Thorac Surg. 1987;44:173–179.
    1. Schulman NH, Subramanian V. Sternal wound reconstruction: 252 consecutive cases. The Lenox Hill experience. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114:44–48.
    1. Kim LJ, King SB III, Kent K, et al.. Factors related to the selection of surgical versus percutaneous revascularization in diabetic patients with multivessel coronary disease in the BARI 2D (Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation in Type 2 Diabetes) trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2:384–392.

LinkOut - more resources