Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Feb;39(2):247-57.
doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2743-5. Epub 2012 Nov 10.

Use of high flow nasal cannula in critically ill infants, children, and adults: a critical review of the literature

Affiliations
Review

Use of high flow nasal cannula in critically ill infants, children, and adults: a critical review of the literature

Jan Hau Lee et al. Intensive Care Med. 2013 Feb.

Abstract

Background: High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) systems utilize higher gas flow rates than standard nasal cannulae. The use of HFNC as a respiratory support modality is increasing in the infant, pediatric, and adult populations as an alternative to non-invasive positive pressure ventilation.

Objectives: This critical review aims to: (1) appraise available evidence with regard to the utility of HFNC in neonatal, pediatric, and adult patients; (2) review the physiology of HFNC; (3) describe available HFNC systems (online supplement); and (4) review ongoing and planned trials studying the utility of HFNC in various clinical settings.

Results: Clinical neonatal studies are limited to premature infants. Only a few pediatric studies have examined the use of HFNC, with most focusing on this modality for viral bronchiolitis. In critically ill adults, most studies have focused on acute respiratory parameters and short-term physiologic outcomes with limited investigations focusing on clinical outcomes such as duration of therapy and need for escalation of ventilatory support. Current evidence demonstrates that HFNC generates positive airway pressure in most circumstances; however, the predominant mechanism of action in relieving respiratory distress is not well established.

Conclusion: Current evidence suggests that HFNC is well tolerated and may be feasible in a subset of patients who require ventilatory support with non-invasive ventilation. However, HFNC has not been demonstrated to be equivalent or superior to non-invasive positive pressure ventilation, and further studies are needed to identify clinical indications for HFNC in patients with moderate to severe respiratory distress.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. J Perinatol. 2007 Feb;27(2):85-91 - PubMed
    1. Respir Care. 2010 Apr;55(4):408-13 - PubMed
    1. J Perinatol. 2006 Aug;26(8):476-80 - PubMed
    1. Pediatrics. 2008 Jan;121(1):82-8 - PubMed
    1. Respir Care. 2011 Mar;56(3):265-70 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources