Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jun;26(3):402-5.
doi: 10.1007/s10278-012-9544-9.

Challenges to protocol optimization due to unexpected variation of CT contrast dose amount and flow

Tracy J Robinson  1 , Jeffrey D Robinson, Daniel S Hippe, Lee M Mitsumori
Affiliations

Challenges to protocol optimization due to unexpected variation of CT contrast dose amount and flow

Tracy J Robinson et al. J Digit Imaging. 2013 Jun.

Abstract

High-quality computed tomography (CT) exams are critical to maximizing radiologist's interpretive ability. Exam quality in part depends on proper contrast administration. We examined injector data from consecutive abdominal and pelvic CT exams to analyze variation in contrast administration. Discrepancies between intended IV contrast dose and flow rate with the actual administered contrast dose and measured flow rate were common. In particular, delivered contrast dose discrepancies of at least 10% occurred in 13% of exams while discrepancies in flow rate of at least 10% occurred in 42% of exams. Injector logs are useful for assessing and tracking this type of variability which may confound contrast administration optimization and standardization efforts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Bae KT. Optimization of contrast enhancement in thoracic MDCT. Radiol Clin N Am. 2010;48:9–29. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2009.08.012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bae KT, Heiken JP. Scan and contrast administration principles of MDCT. Eur Radiol Suppl. 2005;15:e46–e59. doi: 10.1007/s10406-005-0165-y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fleischmann D, Kamaya A. Optimal vascular and parenchymal contrast enhancement: the current state of the art. Radiol Clini N Am. 2009;47:13–26. doi: 10.1016/j.rcl.2008.10.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Johnson TRC, Nikolaou K, Wintersperger BJ, et al. Optimization of contrast material administration for electrocardiogram-gated computed tomographic angiography of the chest. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2007;31:265–271. doi: 10.1097/01.rct.0000236421.35761.7a. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Numburi UD, Chatzimavroudis GP, Stillman AE, et al. Patient-specific contrast injection protocols for cardiovascular multidetector row computed tomography. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2007;31:281–289. doi: 10.1097/01.rct.0000238008.26882.8d. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms