Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Aug;30(7):565-72.
doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1329188. Epub 2012 Nov 12.

Customized versus population approach for evaluation of fetal overgrowth

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Customized versus population approach for evaluation of fetal overgrowth

Maged M Costantine et al. Am J Perinatol. 2013 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the ability of customized versus normalized population fetal growth norms in identifying neonates at risk for adverse perinatal outcomes (APOs) associated with fetal overgrowth and gestational diabetes (GDM).

Study design: Secondary analysis of a multicenter treatment trial of mild GDM. The primary outcome was a composite of neonatal outcomes associated with fetal overgrowth and GDM. Birth weight percentiles were calculated using ethnicity- and gender-specific population and customized norms (Gardosi).

Results: Two hundred three (9.8%) and 288 (13.8%) neonates were large for gestational age by population (LGApop) and customized (LGAcust) norms, respectively. Both LGApop and LGAcust were associated with the primary outcome and neonatal hyperinsulinemia, but neither was associated with hypoglycemia or hyperbilirubinemia. The ability of customized and population birth weight percentiles for predicting APOs were poor (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve < 0.6 for six of eight APOs).

Conclusion: Neither customized nor normalized population norms better identify neonates at risk of APOs related to fetal overgrowth and GDM.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure: None of the authors have a conflict of interest

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
distribution of neonates classified as large for gestational age (LGA) by the population (LGApop, n=203) and the customized methods (LGAcust, n=288). The diagram also shows the subgroups that are LGA by both methods (n=167) and LGA by population or customized norms only (LGApop-only, n=36 and LGAcust-only, n=121)

References

    1. McIntire DD, Bloom SL, Casey BM, Leveno KJ. Birth weight in relation to morbidity and mortality among newborn infants. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1234–8. - PubMed
    1. Schoendorf KC, Hogue CJ, Kleinman JC, Rowley D. Mortality among infants of black as compared with white college educated parents. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:1522–6. - PubMed
    1. Kajantie E, Osmond C, Barker DJ, Forsen T, Phillips DI, Eriksson JG. Size at birth as a predictor of mortality in adulthood: a follow-up of 350 000 person-years. Int J epidemiol. 2005;34:655–63. - PubMed
    1. Esakoff TF, Cheng YW, Sparks TN, Caughey AB. The association between birthweight 4000 g or greater and perinatal outcomes in patients with and without gestational diabetes mellitus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200:672.e1–4. - PubMed
    1. Ozanne SE, Fernandez-Twinn D, Hales CN. Fetal growth and adult dieseases. Semin Perinatol. 2004;28:81–87. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Grants and funding