Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Mar 30;211(3):221-5.
doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2012.05.004. Epub 2012 Nov 11.

Improved corpus callosum area measurements by analysis of adjoining parasagittal slices

Affiliations

Improved corpus callosum area measurements by analysis of adjoining parasagittal slices

Benjamin Seavey Cutler Wade et al. Psychiatry Res. .

Abstract

The corpus callosum (CC) is a bundle of approximately 180 million axons connecting homologous areas of the left and right cerebral cortex. Because CC projections are topographically organized, regional CC morphological abnormalities may reflect regional cortical developmental abnormalities. We assess the variance characteristics of three CC area measurement techniques by comparing a single midsagittal slice versus three slices (midsagittal plus one parasagittal on each side) and five slices (midsagittal plus two parasagittal on each side). CC images were partitioned into five subregions using the Hofer-Frahm scheme under the three methods and variance was examined via two complementary data sets. In the first, to control for intersubject variability, 12 scans were acquired from a single subject over the course of 3 h. In the second, we used scans from 56 healthy male volunteers between the ages of 10 and 27 years (mean=17.47, S.D.=3.42). Increasing the number of slices from one to three to five diminished the coefficient of variation (CV) within subregions and increased the power to detect differences between groups. A power analysis was conducted for the sample under each method to determine the sample size necessary to discern a given percent change (delta) ranging from 1 to 20% iteratively.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Illustration of manual tracing methods. Top: example of a brain in native space (deviation angles exaggerated for purposes of illustration) with MIPAV's protractor tool placed in each axis to execute spatial corrections. Bottom: result of spatial corrections.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Illustration of slicing methods. Left: V1, midsagittal slice only. Middle: V3, midsagittal slice and two parasagittal slices. Right: V5, midsagittal slice and four parasagittal slices.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Original and adjusted Hofer–Frahm scheme. Top: illustration of Hofer–Frahm scheme subdivision proportions with A–P line in blue. Bottom: adjusted MATLAB division of proposed Hofer–Frahm scheme. Region I: prefrontal; region II: premotor and supplementary motor; region III: motor; region IV: sensory; region V: parietal, temporal, and occipital. A, anterior; P, posterior (Hofer and Frahm, 2006). (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Coefficient of variation of unique slice pairs by callosum subregion.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Erlbaum Associates; Hillsdale, N.J., Hove: 1988.
    1. Giedd JN, Shaw P, Wallace G, Gogtay N, Lenroot RK. Anatomic brain imaging studies of normal and abnormal brain development in children and adolescents. In: Cicchetti D, Cohen DJ, editors. Developmental Psychopathology. John Wiley & Sons; Hoboken, N.J.: 2006. pp. 127–194.
    1. Hofer S, Frahm J. Topography of the human corpus callosum revisited—comprehensive fiber tractography using diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage. 2006;32:989–994. - PubMed
    1. Reig S, Sanchez-Gonzalez J, Arango C, Castro J, Gonzalez-Pinto A, Ortuno F, Crespo-Facorro B, Bargallo N, Desco M. Assessment of the increase in variability when combining volumetric data from different scanners. Human Brain Mapping. 2009;30:355–368. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Takao H, Hayashi N, Ohtomo K. Effect of scanner in longitudinal studies of brain volume changes. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2011;34:438–444. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources