Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Apr;46(2):259-65.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2012.10.006. Epub 2012 Nov 10.

Procurement of shared data instruments for Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap)

Affiliations

Procurement of shared data instruments for Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap)

Jihad S Obeid et al. J Biomed Inform. 2013 Apr.

Abstract

REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) is a web-based software solution and tool set that allows biomedical researchers to create secure online forms for data capture, management and analysis with minimal effort and training. The Shared Data Instrument Library (SDIL) is a relatively new component of REDCap that allows sharing of commonly used data collection instruments for immediate study use by research teams. Objectives of the SDIL project include: (1) facilitating reuse of data dictionaries and reducing duplication of effort; (2) promoting the use of validated data collection instruments, data standards and best practices; and (3) promoting research collaboration and data sharing. Instruments submitted to the library are reviewed by a library oversight committee, with rotating membership from multiple institutions, which ensures quality, relevance and legality of shared instruments. The design allows researchers to download the instruments in a consumable electronic format in the REDCap environment. At the time of this writing, the SDIL contains over 128 data collection instruments. Over 2500 instances of instruments have been downloaded by researchers at multiple institutions. In this paper we describe the library platform, provide detail about experience gained during the first 25months of sharing public domain instruments and provide evidence of impact for the SDIL across the REDCap consortium research community. We postulate that the shared library of instruments reduces the burden of adhering to sound data collection principles while promoting best practices.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. SDIL screens and researcher workflow
The REDCap consortium website hosts the SDIL. Users search for instruments based on annotation fields completed when instruments are ‘checked in’ to the library. Once an instrument is identified, users have one-click access to see the instrument rendered in REDCap data collection mode or as a PDF document. When users access the library via their local REDCap installation, they are also presented with a button which allows them to import of the data collection instrument for immediate use within their REDCap research projects.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Library workflow
The workflow emphasizes research-team continuous engagement. The process begins with (1) an end-user recommendation for an instrument (as described in the narrative) followed by a screening and review process by the REDLOC librarian and review committee respectively (steps 2 and 3). If approved the instrument is assigned to a committee member for coding into REDCap format (4) then undergoes testing and verification (5). The REDLOC Program Coordinator sends an official permission letter (6) to the copyright owner (author or publisher) with a copy of the REDCap form of their instrument. (7) Upon receipt of formal permission for publication, the new instrument is included in the library and shared, with proper acknowledgement and terms of use included.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Library metrics
This graph demonstrates the utilization of SDIL instruments over time. The y axis depicts number of projects that are in production consuming shared instruments from the library. The x-axis denotes time by months. The data was collected from across the consortium using routinely centrally collected utilization metrics for projects in production. The dips in the graph reflect the projects that have since been retired and rendered inactive.

References

    1. Bart T. Comparison of Electronic Data Capture with Paper Data Collection – Is There Really an Advantage? Pharmatech. 2003:1–4.
    1. Wahi MM, Parks DV, Skeate RC, Goldin SB. Reducing errors from the electronic transcription of data collected on paper forms: a research data case study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008;15:386–389. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Welker JA. Implementation of electronic data capture systems: barriers and solutions. Contemp Clin Trials. 2007;28:329–336. - PubMed
    1. DiLaura R, Turisco F, McGrew C, Reel S, Glaser J, Crowley WF., Jr Use of informatics and information technologies in the clinical research enterprise within US academic medical centers: progress and challenges from 2005 to 2007. J Investig Med. 2008;56:770–779. - PubMed
    1. Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42:377–381. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms