Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Nov 8;13(6):3723.
doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v13i6.3723.

Dose variations in tumor volumes and organs at risk during IMRT for head-and-neck cancer

Affiliations

Dose variations in tumor volumes and organs at risk during IMRT for head-and-neck cancer

Mercè Beltran et al. J Appl Clin Med Phys. .

Abstract

Many head-and-neck cancer (HNC) patients treated with radiotherapy suffer significant anatomical changes due to tumor shrinkage or weight loss. The purpose of this study was to assess dose changes over target volumes and organs at risk during intensity-modulated radiotherapy for HNC patients. Sixteen HNC IMRT patients, all requiring bilateral neck irradiation, were enrolled in the study. A CTplan was performed and the initial dose distribution was calculated. During the treatment, two subsequent CTs at the 15th (CT15) and 25th (CT25) fractions were acquired. The initial plan was calculated on the CT15 and CT25, and dose-volume differences related to the CTplan were assessed. For target volumes, mean values of near-maximun absorbed dose (D2%) increased at the 25th fraction, and doses covering 95% and 98% of volume decreased significantly at the 15th fraction. Contralateral and ipsilateral parotid gland mean doses increased by 6.1% (range: -5.4, 23.5%) and 4.7% (range: -9.1, 22.3%), respectively, at CT25. The D2% in the spinal cord increased by 1.8 Gy at CT15. Mean absorbed dose increases at CT15 and CT25 were observed in: the lips, 3.8% and 5.3%; the oral cavity, 3.5% and 2.5%; and lower middle neck structure, 1.9% and 1.6%. Anatomical changes during treatment of HNC patients affect dose distribution and induce a loss of dose coverage to target volumes and an overdosage to critical structures. Appropriate organs at risk have to be contoured and monitored in order to know if the initial plan remains suitable during the course of the treatment. Reported dosimetric data can help to identify patients who could benefit from adaptive radiotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Huang D, Xia P, Akazawa P, et al. Comparison of treatment plans using intensity‐modulated radiotherapy and three‐dimensional conformal radiotherapy for para‐nasal sinus carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;56(1):158–68. - PubMed
    1. Chao KS, Ozyigit G, Blanco AI, et al. Intensity‐modulated radiation therapy for oropharyngeal carcinoma: Impact of the tumor volume. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;59(1):43–50. - PubMed
    1. Miles EA, Clark CH, Urbano MT, et al. The impact of introducing intensity modulated radiotherapy into routine clinical practice. Radiother Oncol. 2005;77(3):241–46. - PubMed
    1. Scott‐Brown M, Miah A, Harrington K, Nutting C. Evidence‐based review: Quality of life following head and neck intensity‐modulated radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2010;97(2):249–57. - PubMed
    1. Nutting CM, Morden JP, Harrington KJ, et al. Parotid‐sparing intensity modulated versus conventional radiotherapy in head and neck cancer (PARSPORT): a phase 3 multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(2):127–36. - PMC - PubMed