Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Dec;9(12):674-87.
doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.171. Epub 2012 Nov 13.

Imaging hypoxia to improve radiotherapy outcome

Affiliations
Review

Imaging hypoxia to improve radiotherapy outcome

Michael R Horsman et al. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2012 Dec.

Abstract

Reduced oxygen levels (hypoxia) is one of the most important factors influencing clinical outcome after radiotherapy. This is primarily because hypoxic cells are resistant to radiation treatment; hence, the greater the number of clonogenic cancer stem cells that exist under hypoxia, the lower the local tumour control. Reduced local control will influence overall survival, as may the hypoxic conditions by increasing malignant progression; however, to fight hypoxia, we should first be able to see it. We need noninvasive approaches that can accurately and reliably image hypoxia in tumours, especially using techniques that are routinely available in the clinic, such as PET, MRI and CT. All these imaging methods are already under clinical evaluation in this context. Such data should allow us to identify those patients on an individual basis who have hypoxic tumours and, thus, at the very least should receive some form of hypoxic modifier in conjunction with radiotherapy. Alternatively, the radiation dose could be either increased to the whole tumour or, if the imaging is accurate enough, only to the hypoxic subvolumes. The aim of this Review is to critically assess the potential use of imaging to help improve clinical outcome to radiotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Nat Med. 1997 Feb;3(2):177-82 - PubMed
    1. Acta Oncol. 1999;38(7):903-18 - PubMed
    1. J Nucl Med. 2006 Jun;47(6):989-98 - PubMed
    1. Cancer Res. 1989 Dec 1;49(23):6449-65 - PubMed
    1. J Nucl Med. 2005 Jan;46(1):106-13 - PubMed

Publication types