Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Mar;36(3):580-5.
doi: 10.2337/dc12-0625. Epub 2012 Nov 12.

A simple risk stratification for time to development of sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy

Affiliations

A simple risk stratification for time to development of sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy

Irene M Stratton et al. Diabetes Care. 2013 Mar.

Abstract

Objective: The American Diabetes Association and the English NHS Diabetic Eye Screening Program recommend annual screening for diabetic retinopathy (DR) with referral to ophthalmology clinics of patients with sight-threatening DR (STDR). Using only longitudinal data from retinal photographs in the population-based NHS Diabetic Eye Screening Program in Gloucestershire, we developed a simple means to estimate risk of STDR.

Research design and methods: From 2005, 14,554 patients with no DR or mild nonproliferative DR only at two consecutive annual digital photographic screenings were categorized by the presence of DR in neither, one, or both eyes at each screening and were followed for a further median 2.8 years.

Results: Of 7,246 with no DR at either screening, 120 progressed to STDR, equivalent to an annual rate of 0.7%. Of 1,778 with no DR in either eye at first screening and in one eye at second screening, 80 progressed to STDR, equivalent to an annual rate of 1.9% and to a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.9 (95% CI 2.2-3.8) compared with those with no DR. Of 1,159 with background DR in both eyes at both screenings, 299 progressed to STDR equivalent to an annual rate of 11% and an HR of 18.2 (14.7-22.5) compared with individuals with no DR.

Conclusions: Combining the results from 2 consecutive years of photographic screening enables estimation of the risk of future development of STDR. In countries with systematic screening programs, these results could inform decisions about screening frequency.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cohort identification and inclusion/exclusion flow chart.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Time to detection of STDR from second baseline screening with none or only mild NPDR in one or both eyes. Significant difference across groups (P < 0.0001).

References

    1. Diabetic Retinopathy ADA. Diabetes Care 2002;25(Suppl. 1):s90–s93
    1. Scanlon PH. The English national screening programme for sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy. J Med Screen 2008;15:1–4 - PubMed
    1. Wong TY, Mwamburi M, Klein R, et al. Rates of progression in diabetic retinopathy during different time periods: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Care 2009;32:2307–2313 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Klein R, Knudtson MD, Lee KE, Gangnon R, Klein BE. The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy: XXII the twenty-five-year progression of retinopathy in persons with type 1 diabetes. Ophthalmology 2008;115:1859–1868 - PMC - PubMed
    1. James M, Turner DA, Broadbent DM, Vora J, Harding SP. Cost effectiveness analysis of screening for sight threatening diabetic eye disease. BMJ 2000;320:1627–1631 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types