Subject tolerance of 7 T MRI examinations
- PMID: 23150466
- DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23904
Subject tolerance of 7 T MRI examinations
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the subjective experiences and the sources of discomfort for subjects undergoing 7 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations on a whole-body 7 T system in a hospital setting
Materials and methods: A postscan survey was filled out by 101 healthy subjects who participated in a 7 T examination. All participants answered questions regarding different potential sensations of discomfort including dizziness, claustrophobia, and scanner noise.
Results: Dizziness was reported most frequently, with 34% of subjects experiencing dizziness while moving into the scanner and 30% while moving out of the magnet. Scanner noise was also frequently mentioned as uncomfortable (33% of the subjects). In 11% of the cases a metallic taste was reported. The overall experience was rated by 3% as unpleasant, 51% as neutral, and 46% as pleasant.
Conclusion: The reported side effects are larger than previously reported for lower field strengths. However, overall, 7 T examinations are well tolerated, with only 3% of subjects rating it as unpleasant. These results agree well with previous in-depth studies, and provide further evidence that 7 T MRI would be accepted by patients in clinical practice.
Keywords: 7 T; high field; magnetic resonance imaging; side effects; subject acceptance.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., a Wiley company.
Similar articles
-
Subjective discomfort in children receiving 3 T MRI and experienced adults' perspective on children's tolerability of 7 T: a cross-sectional questionnaire survey.BMJ Open. 2014 Oct 15;4(10):e006094. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006094. BMJ Open. 2014. PMID: 25320001 Free PMC article.
-
Multicenter study of subjective acceptance during magnetic resonance imaging at 7 and 9.4 T.Invest Radiol. 2014 May;49(5):249-59. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000035. Invest Radiol. 2014. PMID: 24637589
-
A large-scale study on subjective perception of discomfort during 7 and 1.5 T MRI examinations.Bioelectromagnetics. 2011 Dec;32(8):610-9. doi: 10.1002/bem.20680. Epub 2011 May 19. Bioelectromagnetics. 2011. PMID: 21598286 Clinical Trial.
-
Prevalence and Financial Impact of Claustrophobia, Anxiety, Patient Motion, and Other Patient Events in Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2020 Jun;29(3):125-130. doi: 10.1097/RMR.0000000000000243. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2020. PMID: 32568974 Review.
-
Static magnetic field effects on human subjects related to magnetic resonance imaging systems.Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2005 Feb-Apr;87(2-3):255-65. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2004.08.012. Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2005. PMID: 15556664 Review.
Cited by
-
Challenges associated with peripheral arterial disease in women.Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2014 Mar 10;10:115-28. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S45181. eCollection 2014. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2014. PMID: 24648743 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The role of latency period in quality management for free-breathing coronary wall MRI.Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Mar;31(3):621-7. doi: 10.1007/s10554-014-0586-6. Epub 2015 Jan 9. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015. PMID: 25573687 Free PMC article.
-
Longer duration entry mitigates nystagmus and vertigo in 7-Tesla MRI.Front Neurol. 2023 Nov 16;14:1255105. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1255105. eCollection 2023. Front Neurol. 2023. PMID: 38046576 Free PMC article.
-
Controlled Release of Therapeutics from Thermoresponsive Nanogels: A Thermal Magnetic Resonance Feasibility Study.Cancers (Basel). 2020 May 27;12(6):1380. doi: 10.3390/cancers12061380. Cancers (Basel). 2020. PMID: 32471299 Free PMC article.
-
Subjective discomfort in children receiving 3 T MRI and experienced adults' perspective on children's tolerability of 7 T: a cross-sectional questionnaire survey.BMJ Open. 2014 Oct 15;4(10):e006094. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006094. BMJ Open. 2014. PMID: 25320001 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical