Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Nov 14:11:85.
doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-11-85.

Microwaves in the cold war: the Moscow embassy study and its interpretation. Review of a retrospective cohort study

J Mark Elwood  1
Affiliations
Review

Microwaves in the cold war: the Moscow embassy study and its interpretation. Review of a retrospective cohort study

J Mark Elwood. Environ Health. .

Abstract

Background: From 1953 to 1976, beams of microwaves of 2.5 to 4.0 GHz were aimed at the US embassy building in Moscow. An extensive study investigated the health of embassy staff and their families, comparing Moscow embassy staff with staff in other Eastern European US embassies. The resulting large report has never been published in peer reviewed literature.

Methods: The original report and other published comments or extracts from the report were reviewed.

Results: The extensive study reports on mortality and morbidity, recorded on medical records and by regular examinations, and on self-reported symptoms. Exposure levels were low, but similar or greater than present-day exposures to radiofrequencies sources such as cell phone base stations. The conclusions were that no adverse health effects of the radiation were shown. The study validity depends on the assumption that staff at the other embassies were not exposed to similar radiofrequencies. This has been questioned, and other interpretations of the data have been presented.

Conclusions: The conclusions of the original report are supported. Contrary conclusions given in some other reports are due to misinterpretation of the results.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Lilienfeld AM, Tonascia J, Tonascia S, Libauer CH, Cauthen GM, Markowitz JA, Waida S. Foreign Service Health Status Study. Baltimore: Dept Epidemiology, School of Hygiene and Public Health, The Johns Hopkins University; 1978. (Evaluation of health status of foreign service and other employees from selected Eastern European posts).
    1. National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), Electromagnetic Radiation Management Advisory Council (ERMAC), Department of State, Applied Physics Laboratory JHU. Microwave radiation at the U.S. embassy in Moscow and its biological implications: an assessment. iii-C-10. Washington: US Department of Commerce; 1981. pp. 1–3.
    1. Monson RR. Analysis of relative survival and proportional mortality. Comput Biomed Res. 1974;7:325–332. - PubMed
    1. Breslow NE, Day NE. Indirect standardization and multiplicative models for rates, with reference to the age adjustment of cancer incidence and relative frequency data. J Chronic Dis. 1975;28:289–303. - PubMed
    1. Lilienfeld AM. Practical limitations of epidemiologic methods. Environ Health Perspect. 1983;52:3–8. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources