Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan;108(1):51-5.
doi: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2012.10.016. Epub 2012 Oct 24.

Sequencing from dried blood spots in infants with "false positive" newborn screen for MCAD deficiency

Affiliations

Sequencing from dried blood spots in infants with "false positive" newborn screen for MCAD deficiency

Shawn E McCandless et al. Mol Genet Metab. 2013 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Newborn screening (NBS) for medium chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (MCADD), one of the most common disorders identified, uses measurement of octanoylcarnitine (C8) from dried blood spots. In the state of Ohio, as in many places, primary care providers, with or without consultation from a metabolic specialist, may perform "confirmatory testing", with the final diagnostic decision returned to the state. Confirmatory testing may involve measurement of metabolites, enzyme analysis, mutation screening, or sequencing. We now report sequencing results for infants said to have "false positive" NBS results for MCAD deficiency, or who died before confirmatory testing could be performed.

Methods: Dried blood spots (DBS) were obtained from all 18 available NBS cards identified as "false positive" by NBS for the 3 year period after screening began in Ohio in 2003 (N=20, thus 2 had no DBS available), and from all 6 infants with abnormal screens who died before confirmatory testing could be obtained. DNA extracted from DBS was screened for the common c.985A>G mutation in exon 11 of the ACADM gene, using a specific restriction digest method, followed by sequencing of the 12 exons, intron-exon junctions, and several hundred base pairs of the 5' untranslated region.

Results: The NBS cut-off value for C8 used was 0.7 μmol/L. Sequencing of ACADM in six neonates with elevated C8 on NBS who died before confirmatory testing was obtained did not identify any significant variants in the coding region of the gene, suggesting that MCADD was not a contributing factor in these deaths. The mean C8 for the 18 surviving infants labeled as "False Positives" was 0.90 (95%CI 0.77-1.15), much lower than the mean value for confirmed cases. Ten of the 18 were premature births weighing <1200 g, the rest were normal sized and full term. Eight infants, mostly full term with appropriate birth weight, were heterozygous for the common c.985A>G mutation; one of those also has a novel sequence change identified in exon 9 that predicts a PRO to LEU change at residue 258 of the protein. Both the phase and any possible clinical significance of the variant are unknown, but several lines of evidence suggest that it could lead to protein malfunction. That child had an NBS C8 of 2.2, more than double the mean for the False Positive group. Unfortunately, the study design did not provide clinical outcome data, but the child is not known to have presented clinically by age 7 years.

Conclusions: These results suggest that sequencing of ACADM from dried blood spots can be one useful follow-up tool to provide accurate genetic counseling in the situation of an infant with elevated C8 on NBS who dies before confirmatory testing is obtained. Of surviving neonates, there appear to be two populations of infants with false positive NBS C8 values: 1) term AGA infants who are heterozygous for the common c.985A>G mutation, and, 2) premature infants, regardless of carrier status. The finding of two sequence variants in an infant reported to the state as not affected suggests the possibility that some infants with two mutations may be reported as normal at follow-up. State registries may wish to consider asking that metabolic specialists, who are most familiar with the variability of these rare disorders, be involved in the final diagnostic evaluation. Finally, providers may wish to consider ACADM sequencing, or other diagnostic testing, as part of the confirmatory evaluation for infants with NBS C8 concentrations that are significantly above the cut-off value, even if plasma and urine metabolites are not strikingly increased.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Box and whisker plot showing the NBS C8 values for three groups of subjects, false positives, those that died before confirmatory testing, and those with confirmed MCADD. The boxes bound the 25th and 75th quartiles; the whiskers (vertical lines) show the range, and the horizontal line represents the mean value for the group. The “NL” or normal group represents those infants with a positive screening test in whom the confirmatory testing did not support the diagnosis of MCAD deficiency; “NDR” (no diagnosis recorded) refers to those infants who died be before confirmatory testing for MCAD deficiency was obtained; “MCAD affected” indicates those infants with a positive NBS who were confirmed to be MCAD deficient. The insert changes the scale for the NL and NDR groups for the sake of clarity.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Box and whisker plot showing gestational age for the for different diagnosis and mutation status groups. The boxes bound the 25th and 75th quartiles, and the whiskers (vertical lines) show the range for the group. All subjects screened positive for elevated C8, indicating increased risk of MCAD deficiency. The groups are the same as in Figure 1, with the “NL” being further subdivided into “NL 985A>G carrier” that indicates infants whose final diagnosis was unaffected who were found to have a single copy of 985A>G; “NL no mutation” refers to those whose final diagnosis was unaffected and no mutation was identified. The child in the NL group with one copy of 985A>G in whom a second mutation was identified is included in that group since that was the official diagnosis.

References

    1. Frazier DM, Millington DS, McCandless SE, Koeberl DD, Weavil SD, Chaing SH, Muenzer J. The tandem mass spectrometry newborn screening experience in North Carolina: 1997-2005. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2006;29:76–85. - PubMed
    1. Insinga RP, Laessig RH, Hoffman GL. Newborn screening with tandem mass spectrometry: examining its cost-effectiveness in the Wisconsin Newborn Screening Panel. J Pediatr. 2002;141:524–531. - PubMed
    1. Schymik I, Liebig M, Mueller M, Wendel U, Mayatepek E, Strauss AW, Wanders RJ, Spiekerkoetter U. Pitfalls of neonatal screening for very-long-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency using tandem mass spectrometry. J Pediatr. 2006;149:128–130. - PubMed
    1. Boneh A, Andresen BS, Gregersen N, Ibrahim M, Tzanakos N, Peters H, Yaplito-Lee J, Pitt JJ. VLCAD deficiency: pitfalls in newborn screening and confirmation of diagnosis by mutation analysis. Mol Genet Metab. 2006;88:166–170. - PubMed
    1. Nagao M, Raymond D, Kim J, Tanaka K. Improved PCR/NcoI method for the molecular diagnosis of medium chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency using dried blood samples: two-stage amplification using two different sets of primers improves accuracy and sensitivity. Clin Chim Acta. 1993;220:165–174. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

Supplementary concepts