Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012;7(11):e49409.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049409. Epub 2012 Nov 9.

Molecular markers allow to remove introgressed genetic background: a simulation study

Affiliations

Molecular markers allow to remove introgressed genetic background: a simulation study

Carmen Amador et al. PLoS One. 2012.

Abstract

The maintenance of genetically differentiated populations can be important for several reasons (whether for wild species or domestic breeds of economic interest). When those populations are introgressed by foreign individuals, methods to eliminate the exogenous alleles can be implemented to recover the native genetic background. This study used computer simulations to explore the usefulness of several molecular based diagnostic approaches to recover of a native population after suffering an introgression event where some exogenous alleles were admixed for a few generations. To remove the exogenous alleles, different types of molecular markers were used in order to decide which of the available individuals contributed descendants to next generation and their number of offspring. Recovery was most efficient using diagnostic markers (i.e., with private alleles) and least efficient when using alleles present in both native and exogenous populations at different frequencies. The increased inbreeding was a side-effect of the management strategy. Both values (% of native alleles and inbreeding) were largely dependent on the amount of exogenous individuals entering the population and the number of generations of admixture that occurred prior to management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Native representation under the different management strategies (N = 100).
Values shown are those obtained at the 10th generation of management. Upper panel: Diagnostic markers, Medium panel: Diagnostic-like markers, Lower panel: Non-Diagnostic markers. a) one generation of admixture b) three generations of admixture, c) five generations of admixture. Vertical bars represent the 95% percentiles.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Inbreeding coefficient under the different management strategies (N = 100).
Values shown are those obtained at the 10th generation of management. Upper panel: Diagnostic markers, Medium panel: Diagnostic-like markers, Lower panel: Non-Diagnostic markers a) one generation of admixture b) three generations of admixture, c) five generations of admixture. Vertical bars represent the 95% percentiles.

References

    1. Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2002) Introduction to Conservation Genetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 617 p.
    1. Rhymer JM, Simberloff D (1996) Extinction by hybridization and introgression. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 27: 83–109.
    1. Allendorf FW, Leary RF, Spruell P, Wenburg JK (2001) The problems with hybrids: setting conservation guidelines. Trends Ecol Evol 16: 613–622.
    1. Vitousek PM, Mooney HA, Lubchenco J, Melillo JM (1997) Human domination of Earth's ecosystems. Science 277: 494–499.
    1. Dalvit C, De Marchi M, Cassandro M (2007) Genetic traceability of livestock products: A review. Meat Sci 77: 437–449. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources