Similar articles

• On tests, times, and the test of time..

  Achenbach S, Chandrashekhar Y, Narula J. Achenbach S, et al. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Nov;5(11):1187-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.09.006. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012. PMID: 23153924 No abstract available.
• Rationale and design of the PERFECTION (comparison between stress cardiac computed tomography PERfusion versus Fractional flow rEserve measured by Computed Tomography angiography In the evaluation of suspected cOroNary artery disease) prospective study.

  Pontone G, Andreini D, Guaricci AI, Guglielmo M, Mushtaq S, Baggiano A, Beltrama V, Trabattoni D, Ferrari C, Calligaris G, Teruzzi G, Fabbiocchi F, Lualdi A, Montorsi P, Bartorelli AL, Pepi M. Pontone G, et al. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Jul-Aug;10(4):330-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2016.03.004. Epub 2016 Mar 23. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016. PMID: 27050025
• Combined CT coronary angiography and stress myocardial perfusion imaging for hemodynamically significant stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a comparison with fractional flow reserve.

  Ko BS, Cameron JD, Leung M, Meredith IT, Leong DP, Antonis PR, Crossett M, Troupis J, Harper R, Malaiapan Y, Seneviratne SK. Ko BS, et al. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Nov;5(11):1097-111. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.09.004. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012. PMID: 23153909
• CT myocardial perfusion imaging: current status and future perspectives.

  Yang DH, Kim YH. Yang DH, et al. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Jul;33(7):1009-1020. doi: 10.1007/s10554-017-1102-6. Epub 2017 Mar 9. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017. PMID: 28281025 Review.
• CT Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion and Fractional Flow Reserve.

  Hulten E, Ahmadi A, Blankstein R. Hulten E, et al. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2015 May-Jun;57(6):623-31. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2015.03.003. Epub 2015 Mar 12. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2015. PMID: 25770850 Review.