Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Oct 28;18(40):5669-78.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i40.5669.

Levofloxacin/amoxicillin-based schemes vs quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication in second-line

Affiliations
Review

Levofloxacin/amoxicillin-based schemes vs quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication in second-line

Simona Di Caro et al. World J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Worldwide prevalence of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is approximately 50%, with the highest being in developing countries. We compared cure rates and tolerability (SE) of second-line anti-H. pylori levofloxacin/amoxicillin (LA)-based triple regimens vs standard quadruple therapy (QT). An English language literature search was performed up to October 2010. A meta-analysis was performed including randomized clinical trials comparing 7- or 10-d LA with 7-d QT. In total, 10 articles and four abstracts were identified. Overall eradication rate in LA was 76.5% (95% CI: 64.4%-97.6%). When only 7-d regimens were included, cure rate was 70.6% (95% CI: 40.2%-99.1%), whereas for 10-d combinations, cure rate was significantly higher (88.7%; 95% CI: 56.1%-109.9%; P < 0.05). Main eradication rate for QT was 67.4% (95% CI: 49.7%-67.9%). The 7-d LA and QT showed comparable efficacy [odds ratio (OR): 1.09; 95% CI: 0.63-1.87], whereas the 10-d LA regimen was significantly more effective than QT (OR: 5.05; 95% CI: 2.74-9.31; P < 0.001; I(2) = 75%). No differences were reported in QT eradication rates among Asian and European studies, whereas LA regimens were more effective in European populations (78.3% vs 67.7%; P = 0.05). Incidence of SE was lower in LA therapy than QT (OR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.18-0.85; P = 0.02). A higher rate of side effects was reported in Asian patients who received QT. Our findings support the use of 10-d LA as a simple second-line treatment for H. pylori eradication with an excellent eradication rate and tolerability. The optimal second-line alternative scheme might differ among countries depending on quinolone resistance.

Keywords: Helicobacter pylori; Levofloxacin; Quadruple regimen; Second-line treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of anti-Helicobacter pylori levofloxacin/amoxicillin-based triple therapy vs quadruple therapy 7-10 or 12 d (A), 7 d (B), 10 d (C) levofloxacin/amoxicillin regimens were considered. CI: Confidence interval; LA: Levofloxacin/amoxicillin.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Meta-analysis comparing the incidence of side effects with levofloxacin/amoxicillin-based triple therapy vs quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication. CI: Confidence interval; LA: Levofloxacin/amoxicillin.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Marshall BJ, Warren JR. Unidentified curved bacilli in the stomach of patients with gastritis and peptic ulceration. Lancet. 1984;1:1311–1315. - PubMed
    1. Snaith A, El-Omar EM. Helicobacter pylori: host genetics and disease outcomes. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;2:577–585. - PubMed
    1. Vakil N, Megraud F. Eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:985–1001. - PubMed
    1. Sachs G, Scott DR. Helicobacter pylori: Eradication or Preservation. F1000 Med Rep. 2012;4:7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alakkari A, Zullo A, O’Connor HJ. Helicobacter pylori and nonmalignant diseases. Helicobacter. 2011;16 Suppl 1:33–37. - PubMed

MeSH terms