Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012;14(1):3-13.

The burden of disaster: Part I. Challenges and opportunities within a child's social ecology

Affiliations

The burden of disaster: Part I. Challenges and opportunities within a child's social ecology

Mary A Noffsinger et al. Int J Emerg Ment Health. 2012.

Abstract

Child development and adaptation are best understood as biological and psychological individual processes occurring within the context of interconnecting groups, systems, and communities which, along with family, constitute the child's social ecology. This first of two articles describes the challenges and opportunities within a child's social ecology consisting of Micro-, Meso-, Exo-, and Macrosystems. The parent-child relationship, the most salient Microsystem influence in children's lives, plays an influential role in children's reactions to and recovery from disasters. Children, parents, and other adults participate in Mesosystem activities at schools and faith-based organizations. The Exosystem--including workplaces, social agencies, neighborhood, and mass media--directly affects important adults in children's lives. The Macrosystem affects disaster response and recovery indirectly through intangible cultural, social, economic, and political structures and processes. Children's responses to adversity occur in the context of these dynamically interconnected and interdependent nested environments, all of which endure the burden of disaster Increased understanding of the influences of and the relationships between key components contributes to recovery and rebuilding efforts, limiting disruption to the child and his or her social ecology A companion article (R. L. Pfefferbaum et al., in press) describes interventions across the child's social ecology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Adams PR, Adams GR. Mount Saint Helen’s ashfall: Evidence for a disaster stress reaction. American Psychologist. 1984;39(3):252–260. doi: 10.1037//0003-066X.39.3.252. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Belter RW, Shannon MP. Impact of natural disasters on children and families. In: Saylor CF, editor. Children and disasters. New York: Plenum Press; 1993. pp. 85–103.
    1. Berkman LF, Glass T. Social integration, social networks, social support, and health. In: Berkman LF, Kawachi I, editors. Social epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000. pp. 137–173.
    1. Bokszczanin A. Parental support, family conflict, and overprotectiveness: Predicting PTSD symptom levels of adolescents 28 months after a natural disaster. Anxiety, Stress & Coping. 2008;27(4):325–335. doi: 10.1080/10615800801950584. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Breton JJ, Valla JP, Lambert J. Industrial disaster and mental health of children and their parents. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 1993;32(2):438–445. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199303000-00028. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types