Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1990;4(1):26-30.
doi: 10.1007/BF00591410.

Endoscopic dilation of colonic postoperative strictures

Affiliations

Endoscopic dilation of colonic postoperative strictures

V Pietropaolo et al. Surg Endosc. 1990.

Abstract

After the use of surgical staplers had become widespread, the number of colonic postoperative stenoses was observed to have increased. Nevertheless, the clinical relevance of this observation is minimal since only 2-5% of the patients complain of chronic constipation or obstruction symptoms. In such cases medical therapy is somewhat troublesome, and surgical treatment always implies a major operation. Endoscopic dilation has proved to be a reliable, simple, and safe therapeutic alternative. Forty-two patients with evidence of stenosis of either colocolic or colorectal anastomosis underwent mechanical or pneumatic dilation in our unit: 19 patients with a temporary diverting stoma were dilated before the colostomy was removed; in the remaining 23 cases, treatment was given according to the patients' symptoms or because it was not possible to pass the anastomosis with an endoscope. The overall failure rate was 2.4%, and no morbidity or mortality was found. When the percentages of patients successfully treated in one session alone were compared (76.9% versus 51.8%), balloon dilation was found to be more effective than bougienage. In our opinion, endoscopic dilation represents the mainstay of treatment of colonic anastomotic strictures, with surgery being reserved for the rare failures, when recurrence of cancer should be suspected.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Gastrointest Endosc. 1986 Feb;32(1):15-9 - PubMed
    1. Gastrointest Endosc. 1987 Feb;33(1):21-4 - PubMed
    1. Endoscopy. 1984 Jul;16(4):149-51 - PubMed
    1. Surg Clin North Am. 1984 Jun;64(3):555-66 - PubMed
    1. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 1985 Jan;67(1):20-2 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources