[Long-term effects of permanent pacemaker implantation on tricuspid valve regurgitation]

Abstract

Objective: To explore the long-term effects of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) on tricuspid valve regurgitation (TR) in Chinese patients so as to determine the incidence and related factors, evaluate its effects on heart structure and function and ascertain the exact mechanism of TR after PPI.

Methods: A total of 430 patients undergoing permanent pacemaker replacement at our hospital between January 2000 and June 2011 were recruited. The patients with isolated atrial lead implantation procedures, significant heart valve disease or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were excluded. The data of 108 patients who had Doppler echocardiograms performed before the first pacemaker implantation procedure and this pacemaker replacement procedure were obtained and retrospectively analyzed. According to the post-implant grade of TR, the patients were divided into two groups: normal tricuspid (n = 79) and abnormal tricuspid (n = 29). Their clinical characteristics and echocardiographic data between two groups were analyzed and compared.

Results: The mean follow-up time (from the first pacemaker implantation) was (13 ± 6) years (range: 4 - 34). Among 108 patients with initially normal tricuspid post-implant, 29 patients (26.9%) developed significant TR during the follow-up. In comparison to those in normal tricuspid group, the patients in abnormal tricuspid group had a longer time from the first pacemaker implantation ((16 ± 7) vs (12 ± 5) years, P = 0.003), more transtricuspid leads (1.31 ± 0.66 vs 1.10 ± 0.30, P = 0.026), larger right atrial size ((38 ± 7) vs (35 ± 4) mm, P = 0.028) and higher prevalence of mild TR and mitral valve regurgitation (MR) pre-implantation (TR: 21% vs 4%, P = 0.015, MR: 28% vs 5%, P = 0.003). The size of right atrium, right ventricle and left atrium in abnormal tricuspid group were more than those in normal tricuspid group. The prevalence of significant MR post-implantation in abnormal tricuspid group was higher than that in normal tricuspid group. The ejection fraction in abnormal tricuspid group was lower than that in normal tricuspid group during the follow-up.

Conclusions: Abnormal TR after PPI during a long-term follow-up is quite common. The related factors include the time interval from the first pacemaker implantation, number of transtricuspid lead, right atrial size, mild TR and MR pre-implantation.