Sequential versus triple therapy for the first-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori: a multicentre, open-label, randomised trial
- PMID: 23158886
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61579-7
Sequential versus triple therapy for the first-line treatment of Helicobacter pylori: a multicentre, open-label, randomised trial
Erratum in
- Lancet. 2013 Apr 13;381(9874):1276
Abstract
Background: Whether sequential treatment can replace triple therapy as the standard treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection is unknown. We compared the efficacy of sequential treatment for 10 days and 14 days with triple therapy for 14 days in first-line treatment.
Methods: For this multicentre, open-label, randomised trial, we recruited patients (≥20 years of age) with H pylori infection from six centres in Taiwan. Using a computer-generated randomisation sequence, we randomly allocated patients (1:1:1; block sizes of six) to either sequential treatment (lansoprazole 30 mg and amoxicillin 1 g for the first 7 days, followed by lansoprazole 30 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, and metronidazole 500 mg for another 7 days; with all drugs given twice daily) for either 10 days (S-10) or 14 days (S-14), of 14 days of triple therapy (T-14; lansoprazole 30 mg, amoxicillin 1 g, and clarithromycin 500 mg for 14 days; with all drugs given twice daily). Investigators were masked to treatment allocation. Our primary outcome was the eradication rate in first-line treatment by intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01042184.
Findings: Between Dec 28, 2009, and Sept 24, 2011, we enrolled 900 patients: 300 to each group. The eradication rate was 90·7% (95% CI 87·4-94·0; 272 of 300 patients) in the S-14 group, 87·0% (83·2-90·8; 261 of 300 patients) in the S-10 group, and 82·3% (78·0-86·6; 247 of 300 patients) in the T-14 group. Treatment efficacy was better in the S-14 group than it was in the T-14 group in both the ITT analysis (number needed to treat of 12·0 [95% CI 7·2-34·5]; p=0·003) and PP analyses (13·7 [8·3-40], p=0·003). We recorded no significant difference in the occurrence of adverse effects or in compliance between the three groups.
Interpretation: Our findings lend support to the use of sequential treatment as the standard first-line treatment for H pylori infection.
Funding: National Taiwan University Hospital and National Science Council.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Defining the role of sequential therapy for H pylori infection.Lancet. 2013 Jan 19;381(9862):180-2. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61849-2. Epub 2012 Nov 16. Lancet. 2013. PMID: 23158881 No abstract available.
-
First-line eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori: time for a change?Gastroenterology. 2013 Mar;144(3):652-3. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.01.037. Epub 2013 Jan 25. Gastroenterology. 2013. PMID: 23357055 No abstract available.
-
Quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection.Lancet. 2013 Apr 27;381(9876):1459. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60925-3. Lancet. 2013. PMID: 23622281 No abstract available.
-
Quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection - Authors' reply.Lancet. 2013 Apr 27;381(9876):1459-60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60926-5. Lancet. 2013. PMID: 23622282 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
