Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2012 Dec;43(6):573-83.
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.08.018.

Aid-assisted decision making and colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial

Paul C Schroy 3rd  1 , Karen M Emmons, Ellen Peters, Julie T Glick, Patricia A Robinson, Maria A Lydotes, Shamini R Mylvaganam, Alison M Coe, Clara A Chen, Christine E Chaisson, Michael P Pignone, Marianne N Prout, Peter K Davidson, Timothy C Heeren
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Aid-assisted decision making and colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial

Paul C Schroy 3rd et al. Am J Prev Med. 2012 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Shared decision making (SDM) is a widely recommended yet unproven strategy for increasing colorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake. Previous trials of decision aids to increase SDM and CRC screening uptake have yielded mixed results.

Purpose: To assess the impact of decision aid-assisted SDM on CRC screening uptake.

Design: RCT.

Setting/participants: The study was conducted at an urban, academic safety-net hospital and community health center between 2005 and 2010. Participants were asymptomatic, average-risk patients aged 50-75 years due for CRC screening.

Intervention: Study participants (n=825) were randomized to one of two intervention arms (decision aid plus personalized risk assessment or decision aid alone) or control arm. The interventions took place just prior to a routine office visit with their primary care providers.

Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was completion of a CRC screening test within 12 months of the study visit. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of test completion and mediators of the intervention effect. Analysis was completed in 2011.

Results: Patients in the decision-aid group were more likely to complete a screening test than control patients (43.1% vs 34.8%, p=0.046) within 12 months of the study visit; conversely, test uptake for the decision aid and decision aid plus personalized risk assessment arms was similar (43.1% vs 37.1%, p=0.15). Assignment to the decision-aid arm (AOR=1.48, 95% CI=1.04, 2.10), black race (AOR=1.52, 95% CI=1.12, 2.06) and a preference for a patient-dominant decision-making approach (AOR=1.55, 95% CI=1.02, 2.35) were independent determinants of test completion. Activation of the screening discussion and enhanced screening intentions mediated the intervention effect.

Conclusions: Decision aid-assisted SDM has a modest impact on CRC screening uptake. A decision aid plus personalized risk assessment tool is no more effective than a decision aid alone.

Trial registration: This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.govNCT00251862.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Study flow diagram
PCP, primary care provider; YDR, YourDiseaseRisk personalized risk assessment tool with feedback
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62(1):10–29. - PubMed
    1. Edwards BK, Ward E, Kohler BA, et al. Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975–2006, Featuring Colorectal Cancer Trends and Impact of Interventions (Risk Factors, Screening, and Treatment) to Reduce Future Rates. Cancer. 2010;116(3):544–573. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous Polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58(3):130–160. - PubMed
    1. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149(9):627–637. - PubMed
    1. CDC. Vital signs: Colorectal cancer screening, incidence, and mortality—U.S., 2002–2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60(26):884–889. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data