Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Feb;24(2):417-36.
doi: 10.1007/s10856-012-4812-2. Epub 2012 Nov 17.

Fluoride and calcium-phosphate coated sponges of the magnesium alloy AX30 as bone grafts: a comparative study in rabbits

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Fluoride and calcium-phosphate coated sponges of the magnesium alloy AX30 as bone grafts: a comparative study in rabbits

Mareike Lalk et al. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2013 Feb.

Abstract

Biocompatibility and degradation of magnesium sponges (alloy AX30) with a fluoride (MgF(2) sponge, n = 24, porosity 63 ± 6 %, pore size 394 ± 26 μm) and with a fluoride and additional calcium-phosphate coating (CaP sponge, n = 24, porosity 6 ± 4 %, pore size 109 ± 37 μm) were evaluated over 6, 12 and 24 weeks in rabbit femurs. Empty drill holes (n = 12) served as controls. Clinical and radiological examinations, in vivo and ex vivo μ-computed tomographies and histological examinations were performed. Clinically both sponge types were tolerated well. Radiographs and XtremeCT evaluations showed bone changes comparable to controls and mild gas formation. The μCT80 depicted a higher and more inhomogeneous degradation of the CaP sponges. Histomorphometrically, the MgF(2) sponges resulted in the highest bone and osteoid fractions and were integrated superiorly into the bone. Histologically, the CaP sponges showed more inflammation and lower vascularization. MgF(2) sponges turned out to be better biocompatible and promising, biodegradable bone replacements.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Materials (Basel). 2011 Jun 21;4(6):1144-1167 - PubMed
    1. BMC Med. 2011 May 31;9:66 - PubMed
    1. Biomaterials. 2005 Sep;26(27):5474-91 - PubMed
    1. Indian J Orthop. 2011 Mar;45(2):108-15 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Pathol. 1972 Mar;25(3):229-32 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources