Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Mar;20(3):899-905.
doi: 10.1245/s10434-012-2716-5. Epub 2012 Nov 19.

Utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT for detecting neck metastasis in patients with salivary gland carcinomas: preoperative planning for necessity and extent of neck dissection

Affiliations

Utility of 18F-FDG PET/CT for detecting neck metastasis in patients with salivary gland carcinomas: preoperative planning for necessity and extent of neck dissection

Min-Joo Kim et al. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Mar.

Abstract

Background: The precise diagnosis of cervical lymph node metastasis (CLNM) of salivary gland cancer is important to determine the surgical extent and adjuvant therapy. This study assessed the clinical utility of (18)F-FDG PET in identifying CLNM in such patients.

Methods: Fifty-four patients with intermediate or high-grade salivary gland cancer were preoperatively evaluated with (18)F-FDG PET/CT and CT/MRI. Histopathologic analysis of neck dissection tissues was used as the gold standard for assessing imaging techniques. Tumor and nodal maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) were measured for each patient. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify CLNM predictive factors.

Results: Of the 54 patients, 24 patients (44%) had CLNM. On a per-patient basis, the sensitivity and specificity of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and CT/MRI were not significantly different (92 vs. 83%, P = 0.625 and 93 vs. 97%, P = 1.000, respectively). On a per-level basis, (18)F-FDG PET/CT was significantly more sensitive and accurate than CT/MRI in the ipsilateral neck (96 vs. 54%, P < 0.001 and 92 vs. 83%, P < 0.001, respectively). The mean nodal SUVmax values of patients with and without nodal metastasis were 4.9 and 2.1, respectively (P = 0.008). Histologic grade was a significant predictor of CLNM (P = 0.014, odds ratio 14.46, 95% confidence interval 1.73-120.79).

Conclusions: (18)F-FDG PET/CT imaging and histologic grade are useful for detecting CLNM in patients with salivary gland carcinoma. This finding may guide preoperative planning for the necessity and extent of neck dissection in these patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances