Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 May;45(2):374-8.
doi: 10.4103/0970-0358.101320.

A comparative study of the effect of different topical agents on burn wound infections

Affiliations

A comparative study of the effect of different topical agents on burn wound infections

Katara Gunjan et al. Indian J Plast Surg. 2012 May.

Abstract

Background: Topical agents are used to treat burn wound infections.

Aims and objective: The present work was aimed to find out the in vitro efficacy of different topical agents against burn wound pathogens.

Settings and design: Randomly selected gram-positive (29) and gram-negative bacterial (119) isolates from burn wound cases admitted in burn unit of Choithram Hospital and Research Centre, Indore, were included in the in vitro activity testing for silver nitrate, silver sulphadiazine (SSD), chlorhexidine, cetrimide, nitrofuran, soframycin, betadine, benzalkonium chloride and honey by growth inhibition on agar medium.

Materials and methods: Multidrug-resistant isolates of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria were checked for different topical agents. 1% topical agent was mixed with Mueller-Hinton agar. Two microlitres of bacterial suspension adjusted to 0.5 McFarland turbidity standard was spread over the topical agent containing plates. The plates without the topical agent were used as control plates. The plates were incubated for 48 h at 37°C.

Results: SSD (148/148), silver nitrate (148/148) and chlorhexidine (148/148) showed excellent activity against all the pathogens. Neosporin had poor activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, (4/44) Proteus spp. (2/4) and group D streptococci (1/4). Betadine did not show activity against the bacterial isolates in the presence of organic matter. Honey did not exert any antimicrobial activity under the study conditions.

Conclusion: SSD, silver nitrate and chlorhexidine have excellent activity against all the bacterial pathogens and could be used empirically, while identification of the infective agent is required for selecting the alternative topical agents such as nitrofuran, soframycin, and benzalkonium chloride.

Keywords: Benzalkonium chloride; burn wounds; cetrimide; chlorhexidine; nitrofuran; silver nitrate; silver sulphadiazine; topical gents.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dale RM, Schnell G, Wong JP. Therapeutic efficacy of Nubiotics against burn wound infection by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2004;48:2918–23. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Monafo WW, West WA. Current treatment recommendations for topical burn therapy. Drugs. 1990;40:364–73. - PubMed
    1. Vu H, McCony LF, Carino E, Washington J, Dang T, Villarreal C, et al. Burn wound infection susceptibilities to topical agents: The Nathan's agar well diffusion technique. Pharmacy and Therapeutics. 2002;27:390–96.
    1. Moylan AJ. The proper use of local antimicrobial agents in wounds. World J Surg. 1980;4:433–7. - PubMed
    1. Chopra I. The increasing use of silver based products as antimicrobial agents: A useful development or a cause for concern. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007;59:587–90. - PubMed